Teams

Rovner: Genesis

2023 IA 40 & Over Adult League · 4.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.88 / IOWA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-01-07vs Krause & Bruntz: GenesisLost 04
L#1 DoublesLiz Mallaney / Lori Marchese vs Julie Bruntz / Jenn Smith2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLeslie Shipp vs Mary Krause6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJoy Bachmann / Janet Johnson vs Debbie Mackaman / Jen Brauch0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKellie Hockmuth / June MacKay vs Mitzi Ecklund / Angela Torgerson2-6, 2-6
2022-12-10vs Hill-Matthes & Fink - LifetimeLost 04
L#1 DoublesKaren Mann / Janet Johnson vs Jocelyn Fink / Siri Long3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesLeslie Shipp vs Heidi Hill-Matthes2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAmanda Hilton / June MacKay vs Jenn Willis / Andi Laine1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLiz Mallaney / Kellie Hockmuth vs Holly Shortenhaus / Kristen Dengler2-6, 3-6
2022-11-05vs Rickert & Nixon: LifetimeLost 04
L#1 DoublesDawn Ver Steeg / Karen Mann vs Dina Dulaney / Maria Fedorova4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJanet Johnson vs Tina Duenow1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJune MacKay / Anne Pham vs Patty Avilez / Nina Pack6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKellie Hockmuth / Amanda Hilton vs Wendy Rickert / Cristen Schipper2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-10-08vs Hill-Matthes & Fink - LifetimeSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJune MacKay / Dana McBratney vs Andi Laine / Siri Long0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJoy Johnson vs Heidi Hill-Matthes5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLiz Mallaney / Amanda Hilton vs Jocelyn Fink / Ree Greteman2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDawn Ver Steeg / Karen Mann vs Holly Shortenhaus / Jenn Willis6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-09-24vs Krause & Bruntz: GenesisSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDana McBratney / June MacKay vs Jenn Smith / Julie Bruntz1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJoy Johnson vs Jen Brauch6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDawn Ver Steeg / Karen Mann vs Sandy Wegner / Heather Ditsworth6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLiz Mallaney / Leslie Shipp vs Sarah Corell / Kathleen Weyers6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-09-10vs Rickert & Nixon: LifetimeWon 31
W#1 DoublesKaren Mann / Leslie Shipp vs Patty Avilez / Michelle Rice6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJoy Johnson vs Tina Duenow6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDawn Ver Steeg / Kristen Johansen vs Meg Nixon / Dina Dulaney7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJoy Bachmann / Janet Johnson vs Becky Flander / Rebecca Studer1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Joy Johnson
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.63
Lori Marchese
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Dawn Ver Steeg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.56
Amanda Hilton
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.55
Anne Pham
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.50
Kristen Johansen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Karen Mann
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.16
Joy Bachmann
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.03
Dana McBratney
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Kellie Hockmuth
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Janet Johnson
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Jennifer Kozlowski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
June MacKay
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Leslie Shipp
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Liz Mallaney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Mann + Joy Johnson5258% games+14.5% vs expected
Amanda Hilton + Kellie Hockmuth5164% games+4.0% vs expected
Dawn Ver Steeg + Lori Marchese22364% games+3.6% vs expected
Janet Johnson + Joy Johnson11358% games−0.5% vs expected
Leslie Shipp + Dawn Ver Steeg13559% games−0.6% vs expected
Janet Johnson + Joy Bachmann3544% games−2.0% vs expected
Liz Mallaney + Lori Marchese10257% games−2.4% vs expected
Janet Johnson + Kristen Johansen4256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joy Johnson
43W–12L career · 5 lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
4.00
Lori Marchese
40W–10L career · 1 line in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.63
4
Dawn Ver Steeg
76W–30L career · 4 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Amanda Hilton
58W–25L career · 7 lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.56
4
Anne Pham
99W–28L career · 3 lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.55
Kristen Johansen
24W–27L career · 1 line in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.50
Karen Mann
18W–15L career · 5 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Joy Bachmann
30W–51L career · 5 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Dana McBratney
12W–21L career · 3 lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.03
Kellie Hockmuth
18W–20L career · 7 lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
2.99
Janet Johnson
31W–37L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Kozlowski
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
June MacKay
12W–36L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Leslie Shipp
63W–29L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Liz Mallaney
16W–19L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.