Teams

LPKU-Kumar/PAC 40+ 4.0

2025 Lake USTA 40 & Over League · Men 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-03Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael di Benedictis / Nimish Amin vs David Carter / George Jackson6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2025-04-26vs LBMO-MOORE/Peninsula 40+ 4.0Split 11
W#2 DoublesMichael di Benedictis / Nimish Amin vs Bill Moore / Brett Scherrman6-2, 6-3
L#4 DoublesChuck Raburn / Tom McElhenny vs Markus Herrmann / Norman Holmes3-6, 5-7
2025-04-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesTom McElhenny / Michael di Benedictis vs Christian Lackner / Ronald Smith6-4, 7-6
L#1 DoublesTom McElhenny / Jim Harpham vs Jim Cochran / Jonathan Aberle6-7, 2-6
2025-03-22Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael di Benedictis / Mauro Coruzzi vs George Jackson / David Carter4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-03-15vs LBMO-MOORE/Peninsula 40+ 4.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMichael di Benedictis / Tom McElhenny vs Alfu Miah / Vincent Altamura6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2025-03-08vs LCHA-Hargett/SCWon 10
W#1 DoublesTom McElhenny / Michael di Benedictis vs Ben Williams / Bryan Wymbs7-6, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Bill Leonard
published 4
3.81
Manuel Rios
published
3.65
Tom McElhenny
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.57
Nimish Amin
published
3.56
Michael di Benedictis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
William Cooper
published
3.51
Allan Keswick
published 4
3.26
Jeff Lloyd
published
Jim Harpham
published
Mauro Coruzzi
published
Miguel Pando
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tom McElhenny + Michael di Benedictis213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bill Leonard
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.93
Manuel Rios
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
3.81
4
Tom McElhenny
70W–57L career · 5 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
Nimish Amin
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.57
4
Michael di Benedictis
69W–70L career · 6 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.56
William Cooper
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
4
Allan Keswick
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
Jeff Lloyd
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
Jim Harpham
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mauro Coruzzi
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Miguel Pando
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.