Teams

SDNC 3.0WE FRCC (1PM)/ Birns

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SDNC WE · SDNC - Women- WE 3.0

8 players · average NTRP 2.83 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-08vs SDNC 3.0WE La Costa/ EckerbergWon 10
W#2 DoublesJanie Munce / Kelly Lee vs Gidget Arabe / Jessica Sylvester6-3, 6-4
L#1 DoublesShirley Sek / Janie Munce vs Nicole Vassey-Watson / Jill Ruzich2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Gammon / Lene Schooley vs Carolyn Shea / Jennifer DeBiasi6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2025-05-18vs SDNC 3.0WE Santaluz/ MeyerWon 20
W#1 DoublesKathryn Glaser / Lene Schooley vs Chrystal Meyer / Debbie Kuntz6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJanie Munce / Shirley Sek vs Teri Barnes / Marybelle Plourd6-2, 7-5
2025-05-11vs SDNC 3.0WE La Costa/ EckerbergLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Birns / Kathryn Glaser vs Elizabeth Romero / Barbra Kenyon4-6, 3-6
2025-05-10Won 10
W#2 DoublesLene Schooley / Shirley Sek vs Suzanne Hatcher / Jeana Marvin7-5, 6-0
2025-04-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTrudy Hawkins / Lene Schooley vs Carolyn Shea / Heather Riley7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2025-04-13vs SDNC 3.0WE Santaluz/ MeyerWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathryn Glaser / Mary Lee Krinsky vs Teri Barnes / Clara Justus6-1, 6-1
2025-04-12vs SDNC 3.0WE RPTC/ NgLost 01
L#2 DoublesLene Schooley / Shirley Sek vs Richelle Gaceta / Yulia Kuznetsova6-7, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women- WE 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.74
Kathryn Glaser
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Leanna Thompson
published
2.67
Lene Schooley
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.58
Shirley Sek
published
2.54
Trudy Hawkins
published
2.48
Laura Birns
published
2.28
Janie Munce
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Susan Gammon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Birns + Lene Schooley2741% games−10.6% vs expected
Laura Birns + Leanna Thompson123 matchesnot enough data
Kathryn Glaser + Lene Schooley213 matchesnot enough data
Kathryn Glaser + Janie Munce123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kathryn Glaser
31W–40L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
2.74
Leanna Thompson
6W–20L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Lene Schooley
14W–34L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
2.67
Shirley Sek
2W–15L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.58
Trudy Hawkins
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
Laura Birns
4W–15L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
2.5
Janie Munce
17W–62L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.28
Susan Gammon
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.