Teams

Team 3 River Bend 6.0

2023 NOVA Mixed 40 & Over · NOVA Mixed 40 & Over 6.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.12 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-01vs Team 2 Balls OutWon 10
W#1 DoublesMel Wesley / Laura Forster vs Sarah Matcher / Saad Zarhloul4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-05-18vs Team 1Split 11
L#1 DoublesJames Colucci / Stephanie Frauen vs Don Kim / Joanne Swain4-6, 5-4
W#2 DoublesMel Wesley / Larisa Caicedo vs Daniel Kim / Joyce Kim6-1, 6-3
2023-05-11vs Team 4 Mulan and WarriorsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJames Colucci / Stephanie Frauen vs Jun Chang / Caixia Che6-4, 6-5
L#3 DoublesAbby Colucci / Mario Levine vs FENG LI / XIAOZHEN LIN2-6, 4-5
2023-04-20vs Team 5 High Strung WarriorsWon 20
W#1 DoublesJack Barufka / Stephanie Frauen vs Donald Meyer / Barbara Hancock7-6, 3-3
W#2 DoublesAbby Colucci / John DeMoors vs Mark Neely / Erin Alexander6-3, 6-4
2023-04-13Won 10
W#3 DoublesMel Wesley / Laura Forster vs Paula Murphy / Thomas Murphy6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Mixed 40 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Mel Wesley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Mario Levine
published
3.05
Stephanie Frauen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.88
Abby Colucci
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
James Colucci
published
2.75
Larisa Caicedo
published
2.73
2.68
Hazel Geary
published
2.60
Marisa Daley
published
John DeMoors
published
Kate Wesley
published
Laurie Bennett
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Abby Colucci + Mel Wesley213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Mel Wesley
145W–106L career · 6 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
Mario Levine
7W–15L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3
Stephanie Frauen
117W–162L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%35%65%
3.05
3
Abby Colucci
53W–53L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
2.88
James Colucci
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
91%9%<1%
2.81
Larisa Caicedo
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Allen Amir Parvizian
23W–23L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
Hazel Geary
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
Marisa Daley
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
2.60
John DeMoors
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kate Wesley
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Laurie Bennett
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.