Teams

GSTL18/Whiteside/Stables

2026 Combo 18 & Over-GSTL · Adult Women - 7.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.80 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 14 6:30 PM
Myla Cabildo
Sep 21 6:30 PM
Dunes Golf and Beach Club
Sep 28 6:30 PM
Michele Singleton
Oct 5 6:30 PM
vs N/A
Alice WhitesideLinda Lane
2026-08-31vs GSTL18/Beane/RLTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesCamilla Parker / Marguerite Oliver vs Sue Broderick / Allison Stefaniuk3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDoreen Cribb / Elizabeth Foxworth vs Caroline Zito / Alli Beane6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmanda Drosieko / Tara Crammer vs Clare McLaurin / Olivia Elswick0-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-08-17vs GSTL18/Singleton/PrestwickWon 21
W#1 DoublesDoreen Cribb / Elizabeth Foxworth vs Megan McIlreavy / Kerry Schwanz6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCamilla Parker / Jennifer Thomas vs Catherine Hill / Shannon Sommers6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAmanda Davis / Tyler Easterling vs Michele Singleton / Stacy Hughes7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2026-08-16vs GSTL18/Cabildo/PrestwickWon 21
W#1 DoublesDoreen Cribb / Elizabeth Foxworth vs Suzanne Senchak / Rosemary Folk6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmanda Davis / Tyler Easterling vs Kristy Stocks / Shital Patel4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Thomas / Melissa Griese vs Gwen Murray / Cynthia Moran6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-08-15vs GSTL18/Phillips/DunesWon 21
L#1 DoublesElle Jones / Elizabeth Foxworth vs Payton Yates / Jennifer Phillips1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTara Crammer / Doreen Cribb vs Sarah Prinzi / Amy Springs6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCamilla Parker / Marguerite Oliver vs Sarah Bonnoitt / Dipti Paudel6-3, 7-6
2026-07-29vs GSTL18/Beane/RLTCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLinda Lane / Kylie Vaughn vs Clare McLaurin / Alli Beane7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTara Crammer / Camilla Parker vs Diane Kligman / Allison Stefaniuk6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Adult Women - 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GSTL18/Whiteside/Stables317513114
2GSTL18/Singleton/Prestwick12361386
3GSTL18/Cabildo/Prestwick03361393

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alice Whiteside
published 4
Alison Hayes
published 4
3.64
Amanda Drosieko
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Camilla Parker
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.44
Melissa Griese
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Elle Jones
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Kylie Vaughn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Elizabeth Foxworth
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.18
Doreen Cribb
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Tara Crammer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.04
Beth Ann Moran
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.03
Linda Lane
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
Tyler Easterling
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Marguerite Oliver
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Elizabeth Deschamps
published
2.85
Tracy Heinemann
published
Julee Reslewic
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Heinemann + Elizabeth Foxworth7266% games+7.0% vs expected
Doreen Cribb + Elizabeth Foxworth4157% games+6.3% vs expected
Doreen Cribb + Camilla Parker3250% games−7.7% vs expected
Doreen Cribb + Melissa Griese134 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Drosieko + Tara Crammer123 matchesnot enough data
Doreen Cribb + Kylie Vaughn213 matchesnot enough data
Doreen Cribb + Elle Jones303 matchesnot enough data
Marguerite Oliver + Tyler Easterling123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alice Whiteside
5W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Alison Hayes
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Amanda Drosieko
16W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Camilla Parker
32W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.64
Melissa Griese
16W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.44
Elle Jones
21W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.31
Kylie Vaughn
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.29
Elizabeth Foxworth
45W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.26
Doreen Cribb
32W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.18
Tara Crammer
31W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.16
3
Beth Ann Moran
14W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
Linda Lane
23W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
Tyler Easterling
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.99
Marguerite Oliver
11W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Elizabeth Deschamps
4W–11L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
Tracy Heinemann
21W–13L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%14%
2.85
Julee Reslewic
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.