Teams

MMohammed/SAliota (Carmel)

2023 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 5.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-10-17vs KTreece (Sardis)Split 11
L#1 DoublesMelanie Carroll / Jen Dauska vs Erin Zelickson / Mary Laird Garrison2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMandi Mohammed / Caroline Dudley vs Kate Johnson / Donna Pollack4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-10-10vs EWhite/SAbbott (Jeff Adams)Won 20
W#2 DoublesAnn Shea / Jen Dauska vs Samantha Abbott / Dayna Sheehan6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMandi Mohammed / Debbie Porter vs Tara Marcel / Allie Trexler4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-09-08vs MCollins/FAhn (Life Time)Split 11
W#1 DoublesSUSAN ALIOTA / Jen Dauska vs Heather Enlow-Novitsky / Leidys Pinzon6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCatherine Mclester / Mandi Mohammed vs Julie Dailly / Felicia Ahn2-6, 4-6
2023-08-25vs CMiller (Charlotte CC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnn Shea / Jen Dauska vs Anna Williams / Taylor Russ7-6, 6-2
2023-08-18vs MWalters (Carmel)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMandi Mohammed / Casey Fuller vs Meghan Walters / Katie O'Shea2-6, 4-6
2023-08-11vs PLaughlin (Blakeney)Won 10
W#3 DoublesDebbie Porter / Jen Dauska vs Paulina Coello / Diane DeMus6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Melanie Carroll
published
3.22
Jen Dauska
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.96
Caroline Dudley
published 3
2.88
Mandi Mohammed
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
2.82
SUSAN ALIOTA
published
2.67
Casey Fuller
published 3
2.50
Geralyn McCourt
published
2.49
Lauren Burke
published
2.43
Debbie Porter
published 3
Erin Conklin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mandi Mohammed + Jen Dauska5072% gamesnot enough data
Casey Fuller + Debbie Porter123 matchesnot enough data
Melanie Carroll + Mandi Mohammed213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melanie Carroll
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Jen Dauska
42W–21L career · 5 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3
Caroline Dudley
11W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Mandi Mohammed
43W–44L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Catherine Mclester
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
SUSAN ALIOTA
5W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Casey Fuller
6W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.67
Geralyn McCourt
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%49%51%
2.50
Lauren Burke
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
2.49
3
Debbie Porter
4W–15L career · no lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
2.43
Erin Conklin
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.