Teams

LLW CC United Kaplan 7.0 W

2023 SCTA 65 & OVER · CC SCTA 65+ 7.0 F

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for CC SCTA 65+ 7.0 F have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Paula Olson
published
3.36
Roberta Fischer
published
3.20
Janet Holland
published
3.15
Amy Stets
published 3.5
3.13
Deborah Beatty
published 3.5
3.13
Deborah Cherry
published 3.5
3.03
Sue Haas
published
3.03
Bonnie Lynam
published 3
3.00
Pamela Hostetter
published
2.87
Jessie Mulry
published
2.87
Leslie Kaplan
published
Leslie Light
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Cherry + Janet Holland4354% gamesnot enough data
Deborah Beatty + Amy Stets303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paula Olson
31W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.50
Roberta Fischer
14W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.36
Janet Holland
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.20
3.5
Amy Stets
16W–20L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Deborah Beatty
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Deborah Cherry
12W–13L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.13
Sue Haas
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Bonnie Lynam
18W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.03
Pamela Hostetter
16W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.00
Jessie Mulry
3W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
2.87
Leslie Kaplan
18W–25L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
2.87
Leslie Light
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.