Teams

Miss Hits!

2024 Tri-One Doubles League · 4.5 Women

4 players · average NTRP / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-09-29vs KRC BADDIESLost 01
L#1 DoublesEllen Ramantin / Kelsey Wilson vs Shannon Rogers / Ashley Cabral0-6, 3-6
2024-09-22vs Ace Ace In Your FaceLost 01
L#1 DoublesStacey Merrick / Ellen Ramantin vs Aureana Wong / Jan Matsumoto0-6, 0-6
2024-09-15vs DARE DOUBLESLost 01
L#1 DoublesEllen Ramantin / Stacey Merrick vs Dionne Kahale-Sirp / Tonya Dale3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-09-01vs Game, Set, Martini!Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPraphaporn Downing / Ellen Ramantin vs Colleen Oshiro / Ean Smith1-6, 2-6
2024-09-01vs Shaka WaveLost 01
L#1 DoublesEllen Ramantin / Kelsey Wilson vs Jennifer Day / Jane Schumacker1-6, 1-6
2024-08-18vs Ace Ace In Your FaceLost 01
L#1 DoublesPraphaporn Downing / Ellen Ramantin vs Caasi Nakasone / Aureana Wong0-6, 1-6
2024-08-11vs DARE DOUBLESLost 01
L#1 DoublesEllen Ramantin / Praphaporn Downing vs Jessica Nishikawa / Yukashi Smith3-6, 5-7
2024-08-04vs KRC BADDIESLost 01
L#1 DoublesKelsey Wilson / Stacey Merrick vs Shannon Rogers / Chelsea Patton3-6, 4-6
2024-07-28vs Game, Set, Martini!Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPraphaporn Downing / Kelsey Wilson vs Haley Fujimori / Colleen Oshiro2-6, 2-6
2024-07-21vs Shaka WaveLost 01
L#1 DoublesPraphaporn Downing / Ellen Ramantin vs Jennifer Day / Akiko Oshiro2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ace Ace In Your Face100100142
2Shaka Wave6464862
3KRC BADDIES6464979
4Game, Set, Martini!6464985
5DARE DOUBLES282817114
6Miss Hits!01001020121

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Stacey Merrick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.90
Praphaporn Downing
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Ellen Ramantin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kelsey Wilson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Praphaporn Downing + Ellen Ramantin1627% games−14.5% vs expected
Stacey Merrick + Praphaporn Downing123 matchesnot enough data
Kelsey Wilson + Ellen Ramantin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacey Merrick
117W–64L career · 7 lines in 2024
25%74%<1%
4.09
Praphaporn Downing
79W–100L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%76%23%
3.90
Ellen Ramantin
25W–57L career · 8 lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
3.46
Kelsey Wilson
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.