Teams

SGV Dare Doubles-Hofstad-WN/SU

2024 Adult Division - 18 & Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 SinglesRebecca Escandon vs Sharon Elliott6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCara Hofstad / Lauren Koenig vs Katie Tong / Sharon Li6-4, 6-1
W#1 DoublesCara Hofstad / Franciz Bragg vs Kathy Wilkinson / Angelica Ramos6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAdrienne Beauvois / Jina Lee vs Quynh Nghiem / Whitney Johnson6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesRebecca Escandon vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesEnnie Gonzaga / Ronalyn Raymundo vs Joanna Aguinaldo / Nancy Lopez4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary Chau / Cara Hofstad vs Irina Abadzheva / Susan Yu1-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesFranciz Bragg / Cara Hofstad vs Rumduol Vuong / Deborah Babineau3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRebecca Escandon / Ming-Ming Peng vs Cristina Padron / Elizabeth Hall4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesCara Hofstad / Franciz Bragg vs Nat Newton / Debra Nelson6-1, 6-4
W#1 DoublesCara Hofstad / Franciz Bragg vs Trish Newlin / Aydee Martinez7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJina Lee / Rebecca Escandon vs Jennifer Miller / Shannon Sapp3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRonalyn Raymundo / Ennie Gonzaga vs Jenna Parker / Carrie Ou4-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesAdrienne Beauvois / Mary Chau vs Xiaochun Wang / Theona Zhordania1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCara Hofstad / Franciz Bragg vs Daniela Chung / Claudia Ibarra6-7, 4-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesRebecca Escandon vs Christina Islas1-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesCara Hofstad / Franciz Bragg vs Alma Banuelos / Laura Laun6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Ming-Ming Peng
published 4
3.95
Julie Flygare
published
3.85
Adrienne Beauvois
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.79
Cara Hofstad
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.75
Rebecca Escandon
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
Candice Hung
published 4
3.59
Lauren Koenig
published
3.59
Ennie Gonzaga
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Karen Beutler
published
3.50
Franciz Bragg
published
3.46
Ellie Wei
published
3.42
Mary Chau
published
3.32
Stacey Zhao
published
3.12
Joanna Gardner
published
Ronalyn Raymundo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cara Hofstad + Franciz Bragg11852% games+3.2% vs expected
Adrienne Beauvois + Franciz Bragg2444% games−2.1% vs expected
Adrienne Beauvois + Cara Hofstad13856% games−3.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ming-Ming Peng
52W–34L career · no lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
4.07
Julie Flygare
17W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.95
4
Adrienne Beauvois
152W–119L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Cara Hofstad
218W–155L career · 8 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Rebecca Escandon
158W–86L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Candice Hung
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lauren Koenig
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Ennie Gonzaga
112W–93L career · 2 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
Karen Beutler
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
26%73%<1%
3.59
Franciz Bragg
10W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.50
Ellie Wei
4W–12L career · no lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
3.46
Mary Chau
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.42
Stacey Zhao
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.32
Joanna Gardner
29W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%19%81%
3.12
Ronalyn Raymundo
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.