Teams

Roland/Knoxville

2026 Adult 40 & Over-Knoxville · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-17vs Rhody/KnoxvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesSarah Olesiuk / Courtney Dyer vs Linda Arms / Tracy Polite6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesElsa Roland / Rebecca Allen vs Jana Dovgan / Renee Bagwell6-4, 6-1
2026-05-03vs Rhody/KnoxvilleWon 40
W#1 DoublesHeather Wilson / Brooke Govert vs Marcia Bates / Sarah Attkisson6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesHilary Brooks vs Angela Rae Rhody6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLinda Dayringer / Debra Chaniott vs Younsun Choi / Brenda Rayfield6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#4 DoublesMichelle Farley / Katherine Goodner vs Martha Filipkowski / LeighAnn Carlton6-0, 6-1
2026-04-21vs Rhody/KnoxvilleWon 50
W#1 DoublesCourtney Dyer / Anessa Savici vs Jana Dovgan / Renee Bagwell6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesRebecca Bender vs Angela Rae Rhody6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesElsa Roland / Anna Taylor vs Tracy Polite / Linda Arms6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRebecca Allen / Sarah Olesiuk vs Sarah Attkisson / Marcia Bates6-0, 6-0
W#4 DoublesAmy Belew / Annabel Sims vs Younsun Choi / LeighAnn Carlton6-1, 6-3
2026-04-19vs Rhody/KnoxvilleWon 40
W#1 DoublesHeather Wilson / Brooke Govert vs Linda Arms / Cheri Arnsdorff6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSarah Olesiuk vs LISA PETTY6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Belew / Courtney Dyer vs Angela Rae Rhody / Jana Dovgan6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAnnabel Sims / Anna Taylor vs Martha Filipkowski / Renee Bagwell6-1, 6-0
2026-04-04vs Rhody/KnoxvilleWon 50
W#1 DoublesMichelle Farley / Heather Wilson vs Angela Rae Rhody / Jana Dovgan6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKatherine Goodner vs Jennifer Mendoza6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesElsa Roland / Rebecca Allen vs Sarah Attkisson / LeighAnn Carlton6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRebecca Bender / Heather Varnell vs Marcia Bates / Renee Bagwell6-1, 6-3
W#4 DoublesAnessa Savici / Anna Taylor vs Annette Thompson / Martha Filipkowski6-2, 6-0
2026-03-29vs Rhody/KnoxvilleWon 50
W#1 DoublesRebecca Allen / Elsa Roland vs Cheri Arnsdorff / Linda Arms6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesBrooke Govert vs LISA PETTY6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHeather Varnell / Rebecca Bender vs Brenda Rayfield / Sarah Attkisson6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Belew / Katherine Goodner vs Younsun Choi / Jana Dovgan6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#4 DoublesLora Boatman / Sarah Olesiuk vs Jennifer Mendoza / Angela Rae Rhody7-6, 7-5
2026-03-22vs Rhody/KnoxvilleWon 50
W#1 DoublesMichelle Farley / Heather Wilson vs Sarah Attkisson / Brenda Rayfield6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesHilary Brooks vs LISA PETTY6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSarah Olesiuk / Whitney Callahan vs Tracy Polite / Younsun Choi6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDebra Chaniott / Linda Dayringer vs Martha Filipkowski / LeighAnn Carlton6-2, 6-2
W#4 DoublesAnnabel Sims / Lora Boatman vs Angela Rae Rhody / Jennifer Mendoza6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Debra Chaniott
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.06
Brooke Govert
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.00
Amy Belew
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Anessa Savici
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.88
Sarah Olesiuk
usually #4 Doubles 20%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.80
Linda Dayringer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Courtney Dyer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Michelle Farley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
2.73
Elsa Roland
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
Katherine Goodner
usually #4 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.62
Annabel Sims
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.60
Hilary Brooks
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.59
Rebecca Bender
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elsa Roland + Rebecca Bender6072% games+18.4% vs expected
Linda Dayringer + Debra Chaniott5351% games−2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Debra Chaniott
10W–6L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.20
3
Brooke Govert
26W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Amy Belew
9W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Anessa Savici
26W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Sarah Olesiuk
28W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
Linda Dayringer
11W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.80
3
Courtney Dyer
22W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Michelle Farley
8W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
2.78
Elsa Roland
47W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%5%95%
2.73
Katherine Goodner
7W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
3
Annabel Sims
28W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62
Hilary Brooks
26W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%23%77%
2.60
Rebecca Bender
23W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%26%74%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.