Teams

PLEASANTON CW7.5A-DT

2025 COMBO - Daytime · Women 7.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-09-03vs OSAGE PK CW7.5A-DTWon 21
W#1 DoublesBowyee Gong / Sara Bogado vs Marci Dublin / Jessica Kelmon6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesShawn Copenhagen / Sarah Carey vs Trish Nornhold / Rachel Gilchrist6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesNicole Cring / Trish O'Connor vs Wendy Greer / Lang Lindsay1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Corazon Bellamy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.82
Mika Tsuchiiwa
published
3.73
Bowyee Gong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Debbie Soleta
published 4
3.70
Shawn Copenhagen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Donna Vis
published
3.54
Dellys Nguyen
published 4
3.44
Sara Bogado
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Dona Ray
published
3.35
Nicole Cring
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Lani Aurelius
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.21
Trish O'Connor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Gayle Abal
published
Sarah Carey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bowyee Gong + Shawn Copenhagen224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Corazon Bellamy
39W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
4.04
Mika Tsuchiiwa
5W–12L career · no lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
3.82
4
Bowyee Gong
41W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Debbie Soleta
12W–15L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Shawn Copenhagen
14W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Donna Vis
21W–14L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
4
Dellys Nguyen
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
Sara Bogado
15W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
Dona Ray
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
3.35
Nicole Cring
2W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
86%14%<1%
3.35
Lani Aurelius
187W–146L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.27
Trish O'Connor
12W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Gayle Abal
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Sarah Carey
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.