Teams

DCC KYRISH

2026 FW USTA Adult Fall Ladies · Friday 3.0 ladies

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-31vs TRO TAYLOR/NORWOODLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmber Parnell / Melissa Wicker vs Lorelei Bautista / Jerilyn Taylor1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPam Leyman / Barbara Kirsch vs Brigitte Haller / Alicia Norwood1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAudra Gorman / Tonya Mccrary vs Jade Brooker / Della Fossum6-4, 6-1
2025-10-24vs VAQ BYRNESLost 03
L#1 DoublesJordy Kelley / Amber Parnell vs Courtney Hesse / Julie Tompkins1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKamron Stevens vs Chandra Holt0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Wicker / Kristen Vest vs Kelley Gilpin / Dyan Colby1-6, 4-6
2025-10-17vs WAG ALEXANDERLost 13
L#1 DoublesMelissa Wicker / Kamron Stevens vs Casey Colvin / Lindsey Elston6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJulie Reece vs Paula Alexander6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJennifer Kyrish / Audra Gorman vs Nancy Lumbra / Kelly Rait3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMary Cooper / Barbara Kirsch vs Shelby Willborn / Carrie McDaniel6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-10-10vs LTF LEIKER/TAYLORLost 04
L#1 DoublesMary Cooper / Kristen Vest vs Maggie Taylor / Kiera Mathis0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJulie Reece vs Molly Leiker2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Kyrish / Pam Leyman vs Ashley Herndon / Laura Rammell2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKamron Stevens / Melissa Wicker vs Mesha Mitchell / Andie Cannon4-6, 5-7
2025-10-03vs STC HANLON/LOUKSLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmber Parnell / Kristen Vest vs Chelsea Cox / Rachel Larocque1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarrie Erdman / Pam Leyman vs Ashley Burnett / Nicole Martyniuk2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMelissa Wicker / Jordy Kelley vs Katlynne Eastin / Nicole Stickane6-4, 6-4
2025-09-19vs BIR FERRELLLost 12
W#1 DoublesCarrie Erdman / Pam Leyman vs Kari Fox / Vivian Hoff6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJulie Reece vs Samantha Dubeck4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmber Parnell / Tonya Mccrary vs Brandy Oetman / Heidi Ferrell1-6, 2-6
2025-09-12vs OAK DAEMWon 40
W#1 DoublesKamron Stevens / Danica Brown vs Adrianne Daem / Andrea Landes6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJulie Reece vs Taylor Robertson6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMelissa Wicker / Mary Cooper vs Holly Caley / Priscilla Vinson6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAmber Parnell / Pam Leyman vs Lamar Muro / Lynn Murray6-0, 6-3
2025-09-10vs STC OWENSSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristen Vest / Melissa Wicker vs Petra Heagy / Kolleen Kiburz3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTonya Mccrary / Amber Parnell vs Dawn Owens / Helen Herron7-6, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Friday 3.0 ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Danica Brown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Kristen Vest
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.75
Pam Leyman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.75
Jordy Kelley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.74
Carrie Erdman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.74
Julie Reece
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.72
Melissa Wicker
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.72
Audra Gorman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.70
Jennifer Kyrish
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Tonya Mccrary
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Kamron Stevens
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.65
Amber Parnell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
Barbara Kirsch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Kristy Mazzola
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Wicker + Kristen Vest4156% games+12.3% vs expected
Kamron Stevens + Danica Brown3256% gamesnot enough data
Pam Leyman + Carrie Erdman134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Danica Brown
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Kristen Vest
5W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Pam Leyman
2W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Jordy Kelley
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Carrie Erdman
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Julie Reece
3W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Melissa Wicker
6W–5L career · 7 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Audra Gorman
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Jennifer Kyrish
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70
Tonya Mccrary
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.70
Kamron Stevens
4W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Amber Parnell
1W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Barbara Kirsch
0W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.56
Kristy Mazzola
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.