Teams

7 ACAC Curtis

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-11vs 9 Westwood DeanWon 21
L#1 SinglesMichelle Lilly vs Meriwether Arnett2-6, 4-4
W#2 SinglesKari Bivins vs Nicole Deiorio6-0, 6-2
W#3 SinglesRebecca Rhodes vs Amelia Lovette6-2, 6-0
2025-11-04vs 10 Magnolia Green WintersWon 30
W#1 SinglesMary Wagoner vs Sunanda Desai7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKari Bivins vs Natalie Winters6-4, 6-0
W#3 SinglesMargaret Thompson vs Jennifer Conrad6-3, 6-3
2025-10-21vs 1 HCC MayerLost 12
L#1 SinglesFay Crawshaw vs Suzanne Gardner6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAshley Curtis vs Amy Coates1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 SinglesTeresa McClellan vs Kathryn Horsley3-6, 1-6
2025-10-14vs 5 ACAC Strobl's Single LadiesWon 21
L#1 SinglesMary Wagoner vs Cecilia Bergh6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAshley Curtis vs Jessica Cox6-4, 3-4
W#3 SinglesTatiana Bueno vs Michelle Eavey6-1, 6-1
2025-10-09vs 3 MTC Singles Ladies - HannonWon 30
W#1 SinglesMary Wagoner vs Tina Hayer6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesMargaret Thompson vs Jennifer Maitland3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesRebecca Rhodes vs Angela Futrell6-3, 6-3
2025-09-30vs 20 Burkwood Lu GoldenWon 21
L#1 SinglesKari Bivins vs Tori Hylton1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMichelle Lilly vs Brooke van Zandt6-3, 6-0
W#3 SinglesTeresa McClellan vs Mary Beth El-Shafie6-0, 6-4
2025-09-25vs 17 CCV PeanutsLost 02
L#1 SinglesMary Wagoner vs Genevieve McGroarty1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAshley Curtis vs Peanut Kempe6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2025-09-19vs 15 Woodlake WhiteWon 30
W#1 SinglesFay Crawshaw vs Suzanne Snyder3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMichelle Lilly vs Jennifer Byers6-3, 6-4
W#3 SinglesMargaret Thompson vs Alison Joyce6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Rebecca Rhodes
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.13
Kari Bivins
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.05
Fay Crawshaw
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
3.04
Michelle Lilly
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.96
Mary Wagoner
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.91
Margaret Thompson
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.89
Ashley Curtis
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.66
Teresa McClellan
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Tatiana Bueno
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kari Bivins + Michelle Lilly10163% games+9.7% vs expected
Kari Bivins + Margaret Thompson303 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Curtis + Rebecca Rhodes213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Rhodes
16W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.17
Kari Bivins
44W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.13
3
Fay Crawshaw
18W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.05
Michelle Lilly
50W–28L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.04
Mary Wagoner
25W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
Margaret Thompson
31W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Ashley Curtis
47W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
Teresa McClellan
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.66
Tatiana Bueno
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.