Teams

GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Alarcon)(TW#2)

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 3.12 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2024 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Damaris Desbois
usually #1 Doubles 45%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.90
Alida Villarreal
usually #1 Singles 28%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.77
Brettney Dee Wilcox
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published 3
2.71
Angelica Alarcon
usually #3 Doubles 82%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 3
Donna Gray
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Hilda Finn
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published
Jessie Lindsay
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Juana Lopez
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published
Katherine Harrison
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Kati Hunyadi
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published
Kristen Swanson-Pallares
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published
Leyla Ramirez
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Lilia DuRussel
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Silvia Garcia
published
Sonia Rangel
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Suzanne Loizeaux-Witte
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne Loizeaux-Witte + Lilia DuRussel3939% games−1.8% vs expected
Katherine Harrison + Damaris Desbois12950% gamesnot enough data
Leyla Ramirez + Brettney Dee Wilcox4162% gamesnot enough data
Damaris Desbois + Kristen Swanson-Pallares3255% gamesnot enough data
Brettney Dee Wilcox + Alida Villarreal4158% gamesnot enough data
Leyla Ramirez + Angelica Alarcon044 matchesnot enough data
Suzanne Loizeaux-Witte + Hilda Finn134 matchesnot enough data
Angelica Alarcon + Juana Lopez404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Damaris Desbois
71W–44L career · 20 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3
Alida Villarreal
40W–28L career · 16 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Brettney Dee Wilcox
48W–46L career · 24 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Angelica Alarcon
28W–51L career · type A · 11 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
Donna Gray
45W–48L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Hilda Finn
81W–96L career · 17 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jessie Lindsay
27W–44L career · 16 lines in 2024
not enough data
Juana Lopez
64W–23L career · 26 lines in 2024
not enough data
Katherine Harrison
22W–17L career · 15 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kati Hunyadi
76W–65L career · 52 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kristen Swanson-Pallares
76W–36L career · 31 lines in 2024
not enough data
Leyla Ramirez
31W–30L career · 12 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lilia DuRussel
28W–32L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Silvia Garcia
0W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sonia Rangel
32W–70L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
Suzanne Loizeaux-Witte
41W–75L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.