Teams

Meaux/18/3.5/TRI/LCRC

2025 Lake Charles Tri Level 18 & Over - Men · 3.5,3.0,2.5 LC (18&O) Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-08-17vs Valentine/18/3.5/TRI/LCRCWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndrew LeBlanc / Jack Vanchiere vs Sonat Por / Dean Manning6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJared Meaux / Brett Carlisle vs Jeffrey Davis / Todd Ammons3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesGarett Istre / Matt Forest vs Nathan Morrow / Todd Melton6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2025-08-10vs Valentine/18/3.5/TRI/LCRCLost 12
W#1 DoublesCarl Comeaux / Lance Thomas vs Paul Gonsoulin / Sonat Por6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJared Meaux / Brett Carlisle vs Mark Valentine / Jeffrey Davis6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMatt Forest / Matt Beaugh vs Nathan Morrow / Todd Melton7-6, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5,3.0,2.5 LC (18&O) Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew LeBlanc
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Carl Comeaux
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Lance Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Patrick Hale
published
3.04
Andrew Kohler
published 3
3.02
Garett Istre
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Jandre Rademeyer
published
2.85
Brett Carlisle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Matt Beaugh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Jared Meaux
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.31
Matt Forest
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jack Vanchiere
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jared Meaux + Brett Carlisle033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew LeBlanc
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Carl Comeaux
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
Lance Thomas
22W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
Patrick Hale
16W–12L career · no lines in 2025
34%65%<1%
3.06
3
Andrew Kohler
13W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
Garett Istre
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
Jandre Rademeyer
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Brett Carlisle
12W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
Matt Beaugh
17W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Jared Meaux
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
Matt Forest
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
2.31
Jack Vanchiere
7W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.