Teams

PRC RED

2024 ITA MIXED - DEN · MIXED 8.5 - ITA

10 players · average NTRP 4.17 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-18vs SS-H GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesMidi Daddis / Greg Connelly vs Amy Chase / Josh Lozow6-3, 6-3
2024-08-11vs LTFC BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesChelsea Ponciano / Ian Kelly vs Joy Herrin / Laurent Dupuis3-6, 2-6
2024-08-04vs WP SILVERSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJean Bouquet / Midi Daddis vs Jacob Toffler / Hannah Preuss4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGreg Arend / Michelle Arend vs Perri Anderson / Syed Sadiq6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2024-07-28vs SKY BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesIan Kelly / Chelsea Ponciano vs Bob Sullivan / Tori Hutchens4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichelle Arend / Greg Arend vs Andrea Sykora / Gregory Tamkin6-4, 6-1
2024-07-21Won 10
W#3 DoublesGreg Connelly / Midi Daddis vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-14vs GAC REDLost 02
L#2 DoublesChelsea Ponciano / Ian Kelly vs Chelsea Ye / Andrew Baker6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMichelle Arend / Greg Arend vs Juliet Beckman / Navraj Heer4-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.5 - ITA have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.11 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.68
Jaren Katz
published
4.26
Midi Daddis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.23
Greg Connelly
published
3.76
Greg Arend
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Chelsea Ponciano
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Hilary Marano
published
Jean Bouquet
published
Macey Daddis
published
Michelle Arend
published
Tanja Sukovic
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Macey Daddis + Greg Connelly2343% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Arend + Greg Arend224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jaren Katz
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.68
4.5
Midi Daddis
56W–94L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%4%
4.26
Greg Connelly
22W–17L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
4
Greg Arend
72W–67L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Chelsea Ponciano
21W–30L career · 6 lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.63
Hilary Marano
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jean Bouquet
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Macey Daddis
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michelle Arend
2W–15L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tanja Sukovic
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.