Teams

Catherine Williams-YTC-18+-3.0

2026 Auburn USTA Adult 18 & Over Fall League · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.12 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-12-11vs Melissa Tran-YTC-18+-3.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesJessica McDonald / Calina Creech vs Sylvia Hood / Denise Cochran6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCharlotte Forrest / Kelley Burke vs Madison Coleman / Alina Samolesky3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Milton / Laura Braswell vs Melissa Tran / Lei Yu2-6, 2-6
2025-11-13vs Kate Finkel-YTC-18+-3.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKimberly Gill / Jessica McDonald vs Sara Nolin / Kate Finkel2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Braswell / Burkley Ayres vs Caitlin FitzSimons / Jennifer Chancey3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCharlotte Forrest / Shaylee Evers vs Stephanie Rogers / Mihee Park1-6, 0-6
2025-11-06vs Melissa Tran-YTC-18+-3.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Milton / Kelley Burke vs Valerie Bennett / Denise Cochran3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesCalina Creech vs Griffin Allen6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesBurkley Ayres / Shaylee Evers vs Melissa Tran / Dahye Jung4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-10-16vs Kate Finkel-YTC-18+-3.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Milton / Megan Corcoran vs Erin Ainsworth / Beth Huddleston0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesCalina Creech vs Mihee Park2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLaura Braswell / Kelley Burke vs Sara Nolin / Kate Finkel1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Kate Finkel-YTC-18+-3.040133996
2Melissa Tran-YTC-18+-3.0137920149
3Catherine Williams-YTC-18+-3.01341224153

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Catherine Williams
published 3.5
2.95
Calina Creech
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Jennifer Milton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Burkley Ayres
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.61
Kimberly Gill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Charlotte Forrest
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.25
Jessica McDonald
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.18
Megan Corcoran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.12
Kelley Burke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.12
Laura Braswell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Shaylee Evers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Vertrina Grubbs
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Milton + Kimberly Gill61141% games−1.1% vs expected
Jennifer Milton + Calina Creech224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Catherine Williams
4W–3L career · no lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Calina Creech
71W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Jennifer Milton
41W–78L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
3
Burkley Ayres
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Kimberly Gill
40W–62L career · 1 line in 2026
22%77%<1%
2.61
3
Charlotte Forrest
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.34
Jessica McDonald
12W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
Megan Corcoran
10W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
Kelley Burke
10W–26L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Laura Braswell
8W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Shaylee Evers
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Vertrina Grubbs
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.