Teams

Peixoto, Summer

2022 Adult 18 & Over Summer 2.5W - 5.0 · 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2022-06-02vs HOAWC/Edwards/18&Over3.5WLost 13
W#1 DoublesSummer Peixoto / Heidi Gluck vs Lynne Ornduff / Marcia Moroney7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCaroline Hau vs Marly McMillen0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMaureen Brady vs Lindsey Kalivoda4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesHUIQUN MA / Deborah Friesen vs Natasha Chappelle / Jody McClain1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Heidi Gluck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Caroline Hau
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Maureen Brady
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.21
Jacqueline Kenoly
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Summer Peixoto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Nancy Yost
published
3.10
Pamela Neidert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Nancy Brady
published
2.95
Michelle Jaimez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
HUIQUN MA
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.78
Deborah Friesen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Karen Evans
published
Patricia Noonan
published
Whitney Maxwell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Yost + Nancy Brady7163% games+13.2% vs expected
HUIQUN MA + Maureen Brady8362% games+11.1% vs expected
Nancy Brady + Heidi Gluck9952% games+9.7% vs expected
Michelle Jaimez + Summer Peixoto5549% games+7.3% vs expected
Summer Peixoto + Heidi Gluck171550% games+6.5% vs expected
Nancy Brady + Maureen Brady4448% games+4.1% vs expected
Karen Evans + Whitney Maxwell3444% games−0.1% vs expected
Nancy Yost + Heidi Gluck7253% games−0.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Heidi Gluck
50W–41L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Caroline Hau
27W–56L career · type S · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Maureen Brady
24W–25L career · 1 line in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Jacqueline Kenoly
50W–69L career · 1 line in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
Summer Peixoto
58W–83L career · 1 line in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
Nancy Yost
37W–39L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
Pamela Neidert
56W–135L career · 1 line in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
Nancy Brady
60W–86L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.02
Michelle Jaimez
51W–59L career · 3 lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
2.95
3.5
HUIQUN MA
48W–56L career · 6 lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
2.89
3
Deborah Friesen
34W–74L career · 1 line in 2022
1%94%5%
2.78
Karen Evans
21W–36L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Patricia Noonan
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Whitney Maxwell
12W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.