Teams

EKyle (FCC)

2024 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women - Fri AM

13 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-04-26vs LMaloney/KHammack (OPRC)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesJohanne Bulger / Tammy Ward vs Susan McGarry / Jane Hadley6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLisa Guacci / Diane Hegele vs Allison Adzema / Thanh Nga McIver1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Kyle / Dorie de Armas vs Susan Castle / Marie Shuford0-6, 2-6
2024-04-19vs HDaly (PCC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesLorna O'Callaghan / Johanne Bulger vs Penny Hill / Janet Reynolds2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDeborah Todd / Lisa Guacci vs Laurie Hoots / Lacey Johnson Boatman1-6, 1-6
2024-04-12vs TSetzer (WSRC)Won 21
W#1 DoublesLorna O'Callaghan / Debbie Malseed vs Celia Stallings / Sandy Johnson6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBrenda Cage / Dorie de Armas vs Bobbie McManus / Kimberly Clark1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesNicole Shelley / Diane Hegele vs Jane Neese / Julie Linder7-6, 6-4
2024-04-05vs KFoster (WSRC)Won 21
L#1 DoublesLorna O'Callaghan / Debbie Malseed vs Barbara Northrup / AMY SAFIR4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesTammy Ward / Johanne Bulger vs Michele Ovendorf / Yvette Gama7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnne Paramore / Diane Hegele vs Catherine Rousseaux / Kathy King7-6, 6-1
2024-03-22vs EUnderwood (Russell)Won 20
W#2 DoublesNicole Shelley / Debbie Malseed vs Ellen Underwood / Linda Glass6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJohanne Bulger / Jennifer Pollino vs Robin Perkins / Sue Francis2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-03-15vs LSobodash (Pine Lake CC)Split 11
W#2 DoublesAnne Paramore / Patty Swan vs Cyndi Thilo / Susan Brightwell6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Kyle / Jennifer Pollino vs Linda Bollag / Laura Sobodash2-6, 2-6
2024-03-13vs JGieker (Lifetime)Won 21
W#1 DoublesLorna O'Callaghan / Debbie Malseed vs Julie Williams / Dominique Oldre6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAnne Paramore / Patty Swan vs Tiffani Wagner / Susan Knowlton1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesTammy Ward / Johanne Bulger vs Erin Bloomberg / Anita Dowker6-2, 6-4
2024-03-08vs LWallace/BHoff (Carmel)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesNicole Shelley / Johanne Bulger vs Michele Collins / Beth Herlocker6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAnne Paramore / Deborah Todd vs Heidi Friedman / Paige Reece0-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesBrenda Cage / Lisa Guacci vs Sharon Dotson / Janat Schramm7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2024-03-03vs MDevendorf (Blakeney)Split 11
W#1 DoublesLorna O'Callaghan / Johanne Bulger vs Mildred Deely / Lu Ann Burke6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAnne Paramore / Deborah Todd vs Margie Devendorf / Dorothy Garrity2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women - Fri AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Nicole Shelley
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
Debbie Malseed
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Lorna O'Callaghan
published
3.31
Tammy Ward
published
3.26
Johanne Bulger
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.02
Anne Paramore
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.89
Elizabeth Kyle
published
2.87
Diane Hegele
published 3
2.82
Patty Swan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Jennifer Pollino
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Brenda Cage
published 3
2.56
Dorie de Armas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.49
Lisa Guacci
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tammy Ward + Debbie Malseed3243% games−15.7% vs expected
Dorie de Armas + Lisa Guacci6551% gamesnot enough data
Johanne Bulger + Anne Paramore6354% gamesnot enough data
Debbie Malseed + Nicole Shelley6163% gamesnot enough data
Dorie de Armas + Patty Swan1641% gamesnot enough data
Johanne Bulger + Patty Swan3351% gamesnot enough data
Johanne Bulger + Jennifer Pollino5164% gamesnot enough data
Debbie Malseed + Johanne Bulger4162% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nicole Shelley
94W–62L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Debbie Malseed
125W–71L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
3.39
Lorna O'Callaghan
11W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Tammy Ward
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Johanne Bulger
135W–67L career · 7 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Anne Paramore
57W–63L career · 5 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.02
Elizabeth Kyle
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Diane Hegele
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
2.87
3
Patty Swan
64W–80L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Jennifer Pollino
83W–86L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Brenda Cage
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Dorie de Armas
40W–90L career · 2 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
2.56
3
Lisa Guacci
42W–56L career · 3 lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
2.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.