Teams

CACI BLUE

2022 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - TRIO

5 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-04-16vs GAC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesHolly Kortum / Mary Candee vs Kristi Samuelson / Lana Pierce6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesNola Nelson vs Susan Aird6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJodi Little / Stacey Anderson vs Marcy Yonker / Ruth McIntyre6-3, 6-1
2022-04-09vs VCC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesHolly Kortum / Cherie Weaver vs Karmen Davis / Elizabeth Koch7-6, 6-1
L#1 SinglesNola Nelson vs Dana Henry1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesStacey Anderson / Mary Candee vs Holly Flora / Christine Aberle6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-04-02vs PRC YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesStacey Anderson / Jodi Little vs Meghan Bennett / Amber Jorgensen2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesNola Nelson vs Maureen Butler2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesHolly Kortum / Cherie Weaver vs Michele Regis / Charlie Ghidotti2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-03-26vs GTC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesHolly Kortum / Cherie Weaver vs Katherine Demong / Mary Logan7-5, 7-5
L#1 SinglesNola Nelson vs Catherine Calder2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesStacey Anderson / Mary Candee vs Christine Regis / Katy Donnelly6-3, 6-3
2022-03-19vs PCRK BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Candee / Cherie Weaver vs Mary Ingolia / Sally Avery6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesNola Nelson vs Janelle Williams0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Holly Kortum
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.75
Cherie Weaver
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Jodi Little
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.64
Nola Nelson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.96
Mary Candee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cherie Weaver + Holly Kortum674554% games+1.7% vs expected
Mary Candee + Holly Kortum9852% games−1.3% vs expected
Jodi Little + Holly Kortum303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Holly Kortum
139W–98L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Cherie Weaver
77W–58L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Jodi Little
69W–47L career · 2 lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
Nola Nelson
20W–48L career · 5 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
Mary Candee
36W–48L career · 4 lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
2.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.