Teams

DI Deuces - T. Wendel

2025 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over ESL · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-07vs Just Buck(horn) it - J. TorresWon 10
W#1 DoublesScott Clementi / David Voelker vs James Schneider / Felipe Guacache6-2, 6-1
2024-11-09vs SVB - D. LynhamWon 10
W#1 DoublesScott Clementi / David Voelker vs Joey Campbell / Chad Paluzzi7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2024-11-06vs Tampa Racquet - B. MurdockLost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Voelker / Tilford Yates vs Bob Murdock / Michael Laccabue3-6, 2-6
2024-10-26vs Plant City Misfits - E. GrayWon 10
W#1 DoublesReece Hickok / David Voelker vs Luke Zoetmulder / Scott McIntosh6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2024-09-14vs Palma Ceia - J. EckermanWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Voelker / Timothy Mualchin vs John Eckermann / Joseph Wright6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2024-09-07vs West Meadows - C. KarkourLost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Voelker / Timothy Mualchin vs Emilio Silva / Rogerio Buchner de Freitas6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Zachary Berkes
published
3.92
Rafael Pagan
published
3.91
Scott DeVoe
published
3.88
Reece Hickok
published
3.82
Andre Kashou
published 4
3.77
Caleb Hirsch
published 4
3.68
Vikram Ajjampur
published
3.67
Scott Clementi
published
3.65
David Voelker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Tilford Yates
published
3.54
Tobias Carling
published
3.41
Travis Wendel
published
3.32
Timothy Mualchin
published
3.09
Ryan Hoecker
published
John Schultz
published
Joshua Freeman
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zachary Berkes
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
4.10
Rafael Pagan
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.92
Scott DeVoe
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.91
Reece Hickok
13W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.88
4
Andre Kashou
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Caleb Hirsch
13W–14L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Vikram Ajjampur
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
Scott Clementi
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
4
David Voelker
109W–90L career · 6 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
Tilford Yates
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.64
Tobias Carling
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
Travis Wendel
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.41
Timothy Mualchin
6W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Ryan Hoecker
1W–11L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
John Schultz
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Joshua Freeman
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.