Teams

CSU GOLD

2024 TRIO - NOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO - NOCO

6 players · average NTRP 3.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-04-30vs CSU GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrittney Stephenson / Laura Powers vs Alanna Williams / Alana Tutt1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTracy Hutton / Michelle Peyton vs Erin Dirvonas / Kristen Frisch2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-21vs FCCC REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Powers / Michelle Peyton vs Tahni Clay / Stephanie Kemp6-2, 6-3
2024-04-13vs TAG WHITELost 01
L#2 DoublesMaisie Knowles / Michelle Peyton vs Nikki Ellis / Kaitlyn Tyler6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2024-04-06vs FCCC REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrittney Stephenson / Laura Powers vs Kelli Barber / Haley Hasler7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMaisie Knowles / Michelle Peyton vs Kaylyn Shelby / Tahni Clay6-3, 7-5
2024-03-30vs TAG WHITEWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrittney Stephenson / Laura Powers vs Amber Slade / Annette Nueske6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTracy Hutton / Maisie Knowles vs Michelle Sheets / Janet Crespin6-2, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Brittney Stephenson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Maisie Knowles
published
3.48
Michelle Peyton
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.37
Tracy Hutton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Marie Massey
published
Liz Cundall
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Peyton + Brittney Stephenson4160% games+1.6% vs expected
Tracy Hutton + Brittney Stephenson5064% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brittney Stephenson
61W–33L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Maisie Knowles
29W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%37%63%
3.55
3.5
Michelle Peyton
46W–23L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Tracy Hutton
71W–37L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
Marie Massey
11W–13L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
Liz Cundall
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.