Teams

Alachua - JTC/Fratila

2021 Alachua Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.07 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-07-11vs DB - BlairSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRoy Cribb / Andrew Messenger vs Philip Karwacki / Nash Dean1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSorin Fratila / Jungyun Hwang vs Jackson Songayab / Nidal Boughannam6-1, 6-3
2021-07-10vs WS - AlpacasWon 20
W#1 DoublesAndrew Messenger / Roy Cribb vs Rupen Shah / Elliott Scott7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSorin Fratila / Jungyun Hwang vs Edward Schmidt / Paul Askew6-1, 6-0
2021-07-03vs WS - AlpacasWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndrew Messenger / Roy Cribb vs Brent Lira / Enrique Vargas6-3, 6-4
2021-06-20Split 11
W#1 SinglesJungyun Hwang vs Nidal Boughannam7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesNoah Roberts / John Lear vs Alex Korotayeu / Philip Karwacki3-6, 3-6
2021-06-04vs WS - AlpacasWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndrew Messenger / Corey Sobers vs Brian Ho / Elliott Scott6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEric Esterline / Jungyun Hwang vs Michael Herriott / JD Wright6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJohn Lear / Erik Schmidt vs Paul Askew / Jack Jacobs3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Eric Esterline
published 4.5
3.88
Jungyun Hwang
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.87
Sorin Fratila
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.81
Andrew Messenger
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.72
Roy Cribb
published 4
3.69
Erik Schmidt
published 4
3.56
Corey Sobers
published 4
3.56
John Lear
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roy Cribb + Andrew Messenger7159% gamesnot enough data
Sorin Fratila + Jungyun Hwang5261% gamesnot enough data
Andrew Messenger + John Lear4260% gamesnot enough data
John Lear + Jungyun Hwang134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Eric Esterline
1W–5L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
4.25
4
Jungyun Hwang
128W–97L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Sorin Fratila
72W–59L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Andrew Messenger
57W–39L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Roy Cribb
46W–36L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Erik Schmidt
3W–7L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Corey Sobers
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
32%68%<1%
3.56
John Lear
66W–84L career · 2 lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
3.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.