← Teams

CHARB-Zevenbergen

2019 Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.81 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Emily McBride
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.78
Kris Kelly-Koster
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
—
Roxanne Imbrie
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.68
Tony Moreno
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Donna Roisom
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.47
Tom Lonergan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.42
Craig Mills
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
—
Patricia Sturr
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Results9 ties
2019-03-03Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesCraig Koessler / Patricia Sturr vs Suzanne DeLea / Adam Gamboa6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTony Moreno / Roxanne Imbrie vs Fumiyo Bookstein / Jason Ruhmann3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDonna Roisom / Craig Mills vs David Greenberg / Tonya Dirk6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2019-02-23Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesTom Lonergan / Roxanne Imbrie vs Jeff Berman / Heather Watkins6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCraig Mills / Kris Kelly-Koster vs Mandeev Brar / Krista Mikalatos6-1, 6-1
2019-02-16Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesTony Moreno / Roxanne Imbrie vs Dan Boren / Julie Brown6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCraig Mills / Donna Roisom vs Jason Moore-Greenke / Yoriko Matsumori6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesTony Solivan / Kris Kelly-Koster vs John Yu / Vivian Nguyen7-5, 7-5
2019-02-10Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesTony Moreno / Roxanne Imbrie vs Daniel Pantuso / Leonor Diaz del Castillo7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesTom Lonergan / Emily McBride vs Sam Ko / Boon Yon Joung6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCraig Mills / Kris Kelly-Koster vs Jeff Wheeler / Vicki Mark6-3, 6-3
2019-02-08Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesRoxanne Imbrie / Tony Moreno vs Sheila Anderson / Arthur Hung6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEmily McBride / Craig Mills vs Kim Wright / Damon Ogden7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKris Kelly-Koster / Tony Solivan vs Catherine Leedy / Andrew Nilsson6-2, 6-1
2019-01-26Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesEmily McBride / Adam Hutchinson vs Flor Harrigan / Steve Vanderploeg6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCraig Mills / Kris Kelly-Koster vs Justin Shull / Severine Michot6-1, 6-1
2019-01-19Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesCraig Koessler / Patricia Sturr vs Kristi Vargas / Michael Lavios7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTony Moreno / Roxanne Imbrie vs Kathleen Budnick / Danny Denning7-6, 6-4
2019-01-13Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesRoxanne Imbrie / Tony Moreno vs Jennifer Richman / Kevin Heller2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPatricia Sturr / Ken Crowley vs Chizuru Watanabe / Nathan Austin6-1, 6-1
2019-01-05Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesRoxanne Imbrie / Tony Moreno vs Eileen Reid / Rick Wong6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatricia Sturr / Ken Crowley vs Molly Murphy / Tod Johnston6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEmily McBride / Craig Mills vs Mary Sides / Perry Sides7-6, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Emily McBride
72W–73L career
0%98%2%
3.85
4
Kris Kelly-Koster
79W–101L career
0%99%0%
3.78
4
Roxanne Imbrie
46W–44L career
not enough data
—
4
Tony Moreno
309W–153L career
2%98%0%
3.68
4
Donna Roisom
100W–85L career
9%91%0%
3.63
3.5
Tom Lonergan
104W–99L career
0%87%13%
3.47
3.5
Craig Mills
58W–89L career
0%91%9%
3.42
3.5
Patricia Sturr
59W–77L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.