Teams

LS:The Hectics:Clippinger/Hawxhurst

2025 ECT Adult 55 & Over Men · 6.0 Men 1

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-02-09vs GF:The Hit Men: Wasterlain/AronLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Fuller / Kevin Hotary vs Patrick Haren / Domenic Giudice2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJames Craffey / Jeff Scheckwitz vs Michael Caty / Jean-Michel Wasterlain3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCraig DuBosar / Tom Lee vs Andrew Kaplan / Neal Thomas6-2, 7-6
2025-02-02vs GF:The Hit Men: Wasterlain/AronLost 12
L#1 DoublesJames Craffey / Craig DuBosar vs Michael Caty / Jean-Michel Wasterlain3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesM Strafaci / Clive Thomas vs Patrick Haren / James Whelan4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJeff Scheckwitz / EARL Smith vs Mark Aron / Domenic Giudice6-2, 6-2
2025-01-19vs GF:The Hit Men: Wasterlain/AronSplit 11
L#2 DoublesPeter Anastas / James Hawxhurst vs Michael Caty / Jean-Michel Wasterlain0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRich Clippinger / Paul Raimondi vs Andrew Kaplan / Johannes Zaaijer6-2, 6-3
2025-01-05vs GF:The Hit Men: Wasterlain/AronWon 21
L#1 DoublesKevin Hotary / EARL Smith vs Domenic Giudice / Michael Caty4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJeff Scheckwitz / Craig DuBosar vs Mark Aron / Jean-Michel Wasterlain2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTim Curtin / M Strafaci vs Andrew Kaplan / James Whelan6-0, 6-3
2024-12-15vs GF:The Hit Men: Wasterlain/AronLost 03
L#1 DoublesEARL Smith / Peter Anastas vs Domenic Giudice / Patrick Haren1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJames Craffey / James Hawxhurst vs Mark Aron / Michael Caty6-7, 4-5
L#3 DoublesTom Lee / Paul Raimondi vs Andrew Kaplan / Stephen Thomas1-6, 1-6
2024-11-17vs GF:The Hit Men: Wasterlain/AronWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Fuller / Jeff Scheckwitz vs Patrick Haren / Domenic Giudice3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRich Clippinger / Steven Johnson vs Michael Caty / Jean-Michel Wasterlain6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTim Curtin / Clive Thomas vs Mark Aron / Stephen Thomas6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0 Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GF:The Hit Men: Wasterlain/Aron0610816144
2LS:The Hectics:Clippinger/Hawxhurst0681022170

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Rich Clippinger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.01
Tim Curtin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
EARL Smith
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
James Hawxhurst
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Jeff Scheckwitz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.79
Peter Anastas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.73
Craig DuBosar
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Clive Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
James Craffey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kevin Hotary
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
M Strafaci
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Paul Raimondi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Steven Johnson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Anastas + Jeff Scheckwitz4360% games+3.9% vs expected
Rich Clippinger + M Strafaci4654% gamesnot enough data
M Strafaci + James Craffey5457% gamesnot enough data
James Craffey + James Hawxhurst4356% gamesnot enough data
Rich Clippinger + Steven Johnson6057% gamesnot enough data
Paul Raimondi + James Craffey2346% gamesnot enough data
Rich Clippinger + Jeff Scheckwitz3259% gamesnot enough data
Peter Anastas + M Strafaci2338% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rich Clippinger
68W–72L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
Tim Curtin
44W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
EARL Smith
30W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
James Hawxhurst
29W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
Jeff Scheckwitz
56W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Peter Anastas
59W–81L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Craig DuBosar
24W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Clive Thomas
38W–132L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
James Craffey
67W–49L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Kevin Hotary
34W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
M Strafaci
42W–62L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paul Raimondi
19W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Steven Johnson
32W–19L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.