Teams

Pell City-Harris

2025 Ann · Gadsden

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Gadsden have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Iris Wilkinson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.12
Allison York
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Larry Sewell
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
2.62
Nora Stokes
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
2.48
Winny Pedraza de Chacon
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.42
Karen Estes
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 42% · published
2.37
Leslie Warren
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Drue Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jan Sweatman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jason Ware
published
Karen Rosene
published
Karen Sewell
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Kim Ellison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Ivey
published
Magen Bearden
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Michael Dobbs
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Rusty Auten
published
Sonya Hubbard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Ivey + Magen Bearden123 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Warren + Karen Estes033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Iris Wilkinson
12W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
3.5
Allison York
17W–3L career · 12 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Larry Sewell
14W–22L career · 14 lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
3.11
Nora Stokes
14W–26L career · 7 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
Winny Pedraza de Chacon
8W–9L career · 7 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
Karen Estes
10W–15L career · 12 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.42
Leslie Warren
2W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.37
Drue Taylor
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jan Sweatman
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jason Ware
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Rosene
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Sewell
4W–6L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kim Ellison
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Ivey
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Magen Bearden
10W–8L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Dobbs
12W–21L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rusty Auten
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sonya Hubbard
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.