Teams

OC What about Love? - GP - Irene - 11:30

2026 SCTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - OC · OC Women - 3.0 - 3.5 - 4.0 Weekday

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 7 played
Sep 11 9:30 AM
Great Park Tennis Center
Sep 18 11:30 AM
vs N/A
Irene WangRosette McClave
Sep 25 10:30 AM
Huntington Club
Oct 2 9:30 AM
Great Park Tennis Center
Oct 9 9:00 AM
Tustin Hills Racquet Club
2026-09-04vs OC YLCC - Shannon 1030Split 11
W#1 DoublesHuma Khan / Janet Wang vs Shelly Morgan / Orkyde Bina6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMotomi Kawase / Allison Palme vs Sandy Swearingen / Nancy Ferguson1-6, 1-6
2026-08-21vs OC Tustin Hills - Julie - 9Split 11
L#1 DoublesStacey Choi / Nicole Festini vs Ann Bentley / Ashley Ballman3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJenny Inoue / Motomi Kawase vs Sue Waltz / Kimberly Mealins6-2, 6-2
W#1 DoublesAida Morad / Janet Wang vs Becky Graham / Julia Bruno McAndrew6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAki Araki / Naomi Sugiura vs Maria Valera / Jenny Thurrell3-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesStacey Choi / Nicole Festini vs Kathy Kelly / Josephine Garrett7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesFabiola Gallardo / Irene Wang vs Dana Bennett / Anita Baron5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-24vs OC LNRC - AmyLost 12
W#1 DoublesHuma Khan / Aida Morad vs Kelly Kehlet / Rena Banducci6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAngela Lee / Motomi Kawase vs Elizabeth Jeffries / Jamie Andersen2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCHERIE SHARP / Fabiola Gallardo vs Kiersten Dummit / Jeanine Campbell0-6, 1-6
2026-07-17vs OC YLCC - Shannon 1030Won 20
W#1 DoublesAida Morad / Miki Sugiura vs Natalie St Germain / Candice Myers6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMotomi Kawase / Angela Lee vs Sandra Barnette / Teresa Yochum6-3, 6-1
2026-07-10vs OC Lifetime RSC - ChrissySplit 11
L#1 DoublesAida Morad / Huma Khan vs Kathy Salter / Kelly Stacy5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMotomi Kawase / Aki Araki vs Chrissy Bird / Jaime Blandford6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · OC Women - 3.0 - 3.5 - 4.0 Weekday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OC LNRC - Amy5011410100
2OC Lifetime RSC - Chrissy40938101
3OC Great Park - Caroline - 11:30316614106
4OC What about Love? - GP - Irene - 11:30238716147
5OC YLCC - Shannon 10302471123192
6OC Tustin Hills - Julie - 90541124172

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Miki Sugiura
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Huma Khan
usually #2 Doubles 79%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published
3.72
Aida Morad
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Janet Wang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Nicole Festini
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.37
Aki Araki
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.34
Stacey Choi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Jenny Inoue
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.16
Naomi Sugiura
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Rosette McClave
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Motomi Kawase
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Lailai Ho
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.88
Allison Palme
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.84
CHERIE SHARP
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Fabiola Gallardo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Festini + Stacey Choi9655% games+14.8% vs expected
Rosette McClave + CHERIE SHARP4261% games−1.6% vs expected
Naomi Sugiura + Jenny Inoue3743% games−5.0% vs expected
Naomi Sugiura + Miki Sugiura10262% gamesnot enough data
Aki Araki + Jenny Inoue3249% gamesnot enough data
Jenny Inoue + Motomi Kawase303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Miki Sugiura
72W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.84
Huma Khan
37W–8L career · 14 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.79
4
Aida Morad
17W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Janet Wang
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.55
Nicole Festini
22W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.47
3.5
Aki Araki
19W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
Stacey Choi
15W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.34
3.5
Jenny Inoue
52W–46L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Naomi Sugiura
96W–129L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
Rosette McClave
36W–37L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.09
Motomi Kawase
10W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
Lailai Ho
16W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Allison Palme
13W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
CHERIE SHARP
12W–16L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Fabiola Gallardo
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.