Teams

LA/Thomas/Old Guys

2022 Adult 70 & Over Multi-State Championship · 3.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.17 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-04-30vs MS/HudsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesAlan Cox / Parry Thomas vs John Townsend / Gaines Dyer2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRobert Lettow / Eugene Cassanova vs Chuck Dunn / Robert Hudson6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesConrad Bourque / Louis Frey vs Earl Stegall / Barry Royals6-0, 6-1
2022-04-29vs AZ/Bryan/MesaLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlan Cox / Parry Thomas vs Joe Ricci / Merle Bryan6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLouis Frey / Conrad Bourque vs Michael Walls / Joseph Hook2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Lettow / John Williams vs Marv Jensen / Richard DeFehr2-6, 0-6
2022-04-29vs AR/Lee/LRWon 21
W#1 DoublesParry Thomas / Alan Cox vs Ronny Tollett / Dalton Coleman6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesEugene Cassanova / Danny Roemer vs Donald Miller / Ned Boaz1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJohn Williams / Robert Lettow vs Kerry Cates / John Boyd6-4, 7-5
2022-04-28vs GA/Meidl/Old and SlowLost 02
L#1 DoublesEugene Cassanova / Robert Lettow vs Robert Elliott / C Moss5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLouis Frey / Conrad Bourque vs Robert Anderson / Robert Seckington0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Danny Roemer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Eugene Cassanova
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Alan Cox
published 3
Conrad Bourque
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Louis Frey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Parry Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Lettow
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eugene Cassanova + Robert Lettow5260% gamesnot enough data
Alan Cox + Parry Thomas2446% gamesnot enough data
Eugene Cassanova + Danny Roemer3253% gamesnot enough data
Conrad Bourque + Louis Frey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Danny Roemer
10W–14L career · type S · 1 line in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
3
Eugene Cassanova
23W–26L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
<1%40%60%
3.03
3
Alan Cox
2W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Conrad Bourque
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Louis Frey
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Parry Thomas
7W–13L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Robert Lettow
21W–18L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.