Teams

IE-Elevenis-Boland

2025 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - IE · IE Men 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-09-21vs IE-Bear HD Elite-Valley-MejiaWon 21
L#1 DoublesJerry Jeen Lee / Francis de Giorgio vs Elmer Chacon / Javier Rodriguez6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesEric Lee / Ken Tomoyasu vs Nathan Hahn / Cris Quijote6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesHung Pham / Kyle Langenbacher vs Ralph Pena / Samuel Rojas7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Nelson Quintana
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.97
Spencer Nguyen
published
3.91
Ryan Roland
published
3.90
Michael Munoz
published
3.86
Quang Tran
published
3.84
Max Austin
published
3.81
Roman Chon
published
3.81
Jerry Jeen Lee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Brett DeCicco
published 4
3.78
3.78
Hung Pham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Francis de Giorgio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Jie Mei
published
3.76
3.67
Ken Tomoyasu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Kyle Langenbacher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Matthew Boland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Spencer Nguyen + Quang Tran4256% games+5.9% vs expected
Kyle Langenbacher + Roman Chon5549% games−4.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nelson Quintana
10W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
Spencer Nguyen
20W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.97
Ryan Roland
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
Michael Munoz
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.90
Quang Tran
17W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
Max Austin
48W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
Roman Chon
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
Jerry Jeen Lee
17W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Brett DeCicco
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Clark Jean-Baptiste
2W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Hung Pham
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%5%
3.78
Francis de Giorgio
7W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%5%
3.77
Jie Mei
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Southideth Phimmasone
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
Ken Tomoyasu
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Kyle Langenbacher
7W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Matthew Boland
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.