Teams

Swann/Nashville

2026 Adult 40 & Over - Nashville · 4.0 Men - Sunday Daytime

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-17vs Gugala/Pierenkemper/NashvilleWon 41
W#1 DoublesJohn Irby / Bryan Meurer vs Jon Gugala / Matt Slocum6-1, 7-5
W#1 SinglesDerek Fecteau vs David Wright6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChristopher Bayham / Christopher Oubre vs Stuart Littleton / Sean Pomario6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDouglas McLaughlin / Nadim Arnouk vs Norbert Molnar / Jason Overton7-5, 6-1
L#4 DoublesDe Dawkins / Patrick Galloway vs Stephan Pierenkemper / Eric Kimmerling1-6, 1-6
2026-05-10vs Piovarcy/NashvilleLost 23
W#1 DoublesDerek Smith / Christopher Bayham vs Chris Kelley / Hitesh Dhingra5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDerek Fecteau vs Igor Shalkevich3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHans Westin / Aaron Peterson vs Jason Snap / Ryan Reeve2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDouglas McLaughlin / John Irby vs John Piovarcy / Brandon Dixon7-6, 7-5
L#4 DoublesScott Swann / William Jones vs James Demouy / Joseph McComb5-7, 4-6
2026-04-26vs Gugala/Pierenkemper/NashvilleLost 23
W#1 DoublesDerek Smith / Jeff Gaw vs Stuart Littleton / Matt Slocum6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesChristopher Bayham vs Clark Campbell2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJohn Irby / De Dawkins vs Jon Gugala / Eric Kimmerling7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWilliam Jones / John Bracewell vs Stephan Pierenkemper / Kohei Yamazaki1-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesNadim Arnouk / Douglas McLaughlin vs Norbert Molnar / Luke McKenty6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-04-19vs Piovarcy/NashvilleLost 14
W#1 DoublesDerek Smith / Christopher Bayham vs John Piovarcy / Brandon Dixon7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDerek Fecteau vs Igor Shalkevich2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJeff Gaw / William Jones vs Chris Kelley / Hitesh Dhingra3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAaron Peterson / John Irby vs James Demouy / Jeff Khan6-7, 4-6
L#4 DoublesDe Dawkins / Patrick Galloway vs Jerry Tassa I / Jason Snap3-6, 6-7
2026-03-29vs Gugala/Pierenkemper/NashvilleWon 32
W#1 DoublesHans Westin / Christopher Bayham vs Matt Slocum / Stuart Littleton6-1, 7-5
W#1 SinglesDerek Fecteau vs Clark Campbell7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDerek Smith / Scott Swann vs Sean Pomario / Eric Kimmerling4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristopher Oubre / Douglas McLaughlin vs Norbert Molnar / Stephan Pierenkemper4-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesJohn Bracewell / Bryan Meurer vs Jason Overton / Hiroshi Goto6-2, 6-0
2026-03-22vs Piovarcy/NashvilleSplit 22
W#1 DoublesDerek Smith / Christopher Bayham vs Hitesh Dhingra / Jim Kang6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesDerek Fecteau vs Jerry Tassa I6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesScott Swann / Bryan Meurer vs Robby Hare / Joseph McComb2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNadim Arnouk / Jeff Gaw vs Christopher Glick / T Scott Baker3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men - Sunday Daytime have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Christopher Bayham
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.86
Jeff Gaw
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.85
Aaron Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.81
Christopher Oubre
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Douglas McLaughlin
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.78
Derek Fecteau
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.74
John Irby
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.71
Hans Westin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Bryan Meurer
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
John Bracewell
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.64
Scott Swann
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
Nadim Arnouk
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.51
Patrick Galloway
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
De Dawkins
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

De Dawkins + Patrick Galloway3249% games+2.3% vs expected
Douglas McLaughlin + Nadim Arnouk123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Bayham
16W–2L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.98
Jeff Gaw
8W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Aaron Peterson
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Christopher Oubre
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Douglas McLaughlin
10W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Derek Fecteau
16W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.78
John Irby
11W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Hans Westin
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Bryan Meurer
3W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
John Bracewell
13W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.67
Scott Swann
9W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
Nadim Arnouk
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.54
Patrick Galloway
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.51
4
De Dawkins
9W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
3.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.