Teams

Desoto - Simmons

2026 Brevard Combo 50 & Over · 7.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.72 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 12 9:00 AM
Desoto Courts
Sep 19 9:00 AM
Desoto Courts
Sep 26 9:00 AM
Desoto Courts
Oct 3 9:00 AM
Desoto Courts
Oct 10 9:00 AM
Desoto Courts
Oct 17 9:00 AM
Desoto Courts
2026-08-29vs Desoto - WellsLost 02
L#1 DoublesKileen Knight / Gisela Alcalde vs Stacie Neff / Susan Douglas4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNaomi Coleman / Claudia Berk vs Eleanor Sheldon / Miriam Perlmutter1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Desoto - Wells000000
2Desoto - Simmons000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Anna Butler
published 4
3.65
Gillian Dionne
published 4
3.54
Naomi Coleman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
3.44
Lauren Kushner
published
3.39
Gisela Alcalde
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Anne Ramsey
published 3.5
3.32
Sandy Dahl
published 3.5
3.30
Claudia Berk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Gena Wools
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Naomi Coleman + Sandy Dahl9652% games+2.0% vs expected
Gisela Alcalde + Sandy Dahl14855% games−3.7% vs expected
Heather Schleicher + Gillian Dionne3750% games−8.8% vs expected
Naomi Coleman + Gisela Alcalde7257% gamesnot enough data
Claudia Berk + Gillian Dionne4156% gamesnot enough data
Heather Schleicher + Gisela Alcalde4160% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anna Butler
11W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Gillian Dionne
95W–75L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Naomi Coleman
169W–144L career · 1 line in 2026
38%61%<1%
3.54
4
Heather Schleicher
71W–59L career · no lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
3.49
Lauren Kushner
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
3.44
3.5
Gisela Alcalde
267W–176L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Anne Ramsey
9W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Sandy Dahl
209W–133L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Claudia Berk
71W–60L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Gena Wools
29W–60L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.