Teams

WAY:Wayside:Cunningham

2024 EMA Tri Level Winter · Spring

5 players · average NTRP 3.75 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-19vs Winchester TC:DharmadhikariWon 10
W#1 DoublesBharath Padala / Kevin Cunningham vs Aravind Udayakumar / Gautam Erande6-3, 6-0
2024-05-15vs LFW:Longfellow:PintoWon 10
W#1 DoublesAshvin Kalyanaraman / Tom Rosedale vs Peter Kelly / Jason Rennie6-2, 6-2
2024-04-28vs WTC:Winchester: MundelWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Thacker / Tom Rosedale vs Lucas Mundel / Kade Canessa6-4, 6-1
2024-04-21vs WOB:Woburn:YangWon 10
W#1 DoublesBharath Padala / Ashvin Kalyanaraman vs YAN CHEN / Zhiyong Yang6-2, 6-2
2024-04-14vs Winchester TC:DharmadhikariWon 10
W#1 DoublesBharath Padala / Michael Thacker vs Vishal Dharmadhikari / Gautam Erande6-0, 6-2
2024-04-02vs WTC:Winchester: MundelWon 10
W#1 DoublesKevin Cunningham / Bharath Padala vs Lucas Mundel / Kade Canessa6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2024-04-01vs LFW:Longfellow:PintoWon 10
W#1 DoublesBharath Padala / Kevin Cunningham vs Ralph Pinto / Jason Rennie6-4, 7-6
2024-03-17vs WOB:Woburn:YangWon 10
W#1 DoublesKevin Cunningham / Michael Thacker vs YAN CHEN / Zhiyong Yang6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WAY:Wayside:Cunningham0880143
2WOB:Woburn:Yang0862655
3LFW:Longfellow:Pinto0844858
4Winchester TC:Dharmadhikari08261284
5WTC:Winchester: Mundel08081698

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Bharath Padala
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Tom Rosedale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ashvin Kalyanaraman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kevin Cunningham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Thacker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashvin Kalyanaraman + Tom Rosedale5068% gamesnot enough data
Kevin Cunningham + Bharath Padala404 matchesnot enough data
Bharath Padala + Tom Rosedale303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bharath Padala
65W–27L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Tom Rosedale
59W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Ashvin Kalyanaraman
33W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kevin Cunningham
24W–14L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Thacker
24W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.