Teams

MD.Winzenz

2022 CTRL Mixed 18 & Over · Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-25vs LOCH.AndersonWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaige Jennings / Vance Jennings vs Scott Anderson / Rebecca Reynolds6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJim Riddick / Cindy Winzenz vs Kevin Mcdonald / Donna Gast6-0, 6-3
2022-07-23vs TOC.MullinsWon 10
W#3 DoublesJim Riddick / Cindy Winzenz vs Alena Spielberg / Mike Wiwatowski6-2, 6-3
2022-07-22vs TOC.DarnellLost 01
L#1 DoublesJim Riddick / Cindy Winzenz vs Tony Stewart / Stacy Rank4-6, 2-6
2022-06-18vs TOC.BolgerLost 01
L#2 DoublesJim Riddick / Claire Cesta vs Vivian Karimakwenda / Carrie Couto4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-06-11vs TOC.SziksaiWon 10
W#3 DoublesJim Riddick / Cindy Winzenz vs Christopher DeFusco / Betsy Shane6-2, 6-1
2022-06-04vs TOC.XuWon 20
W#1 DoublesVance Jennings / Paige Jennings vs Raymond Xu / Erin McAllister4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJim Riddick / Jillian Sloand vs Claire Songkakul / Ryan Sheppard6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Vance Jennings
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Cindy Winzenz
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
3.98
Jim Riddick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.85
Christina Jenkins
published 3.5
Andrew Winzenz
published 4
3.37
Lisa Griffin
published
3.25
Todd Bachman
published
3.09
Claire Cesta
published 3.5
Kathleen Cannon
published
Paige Jennings
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jim Riddick + Cindy Winzenz314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Vance Jennings
106W–79L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Cindy Winzenz
87W–67L career · 7 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
4.08
4
Jim Riddick
172W–87L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
3.98
3.5
Christina Jenkins
36W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%<1%>99%
3.85
4
Andrew Winzenz
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Griffin
26W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
Todd Bachman
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Claire Cesta
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.09
Kathleen Cannon
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Paige Jennings
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.