Teams

LLW - Bake - Grant

2022 Tri-Level Doubles - Bakersfield · 3.0-4.0 Women - Bake

15 players · average NTRP 3.77 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-09-25vs Bake - FernandezWon 10
W#2 DoublesLinette Holliday / Crystal Neptune vs Leah Coughlin / Rebecca Anderson6-1, 7-5
2022-09-16vs Bake - FernandezWon 10
W#2 DoublesLauren Eittreim / Linette Holliday vs Stephanie Ollivier / Brooke Fernandez6-0, 6-2
2022-09-13Won 10
W#2 DoublesLauren Eittreim / Crystal Neptune vs Peggy LEAPLEY / Angela Echeverria6-0, 6-2
2022-09-04vs Bake - FernandezWon 10
W#2 DoublesLauren Eittreim / Linette Holliday vs Stephanie Ollivier / Michelle Pisano6-0, 6-2
2022-08-28vs Bake - FernandezWon 20
W#2 DoublesLauren Eittreim / Crystal Neptune vs Peggy LEAPLEY / Rhonda Slegers6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesEdyta Grant / Briana Starr vs Natalie Chene / Nicola Wright6-1, 6-4
2022-08-21vs Bake - FernandezWon 10
W#3 DoublesEdyta Grant / Briana Starr vs Angela Echeverria / Natalie Chene6-4, 7-6
2022-08-14vs Bake - FernandezLost 01
L#3 DoublesAshley Periera / Briana Starr vs Marites Idica / Brooke Drake5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0-4.0 Women - Bake have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Liza Chen
published
3.90
Briana Starr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Cindy Broussard
published 4.5
3.79
3.66
Lauren Eittreim
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.49
Denise Duquette
published 4
3.33
Edyta Grant
published 3.5
3.31
Carol Maier
published 3.5
Ashley Periera
published 3.5
3.25
Linette Holliday
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Diane Bashirtash
published 3.5
3.18
Andrea Ames
published 4
3.12
Crystal Neptune
published 3.5
Misty Haverstock
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Briana Starr + Lauren Eittreim33365% games+9.3% vs expected
Linette Holliday + Lauren Eittreim3265% gamesnot enough data
Linette Holliday + Briana Starr123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Liza Chen
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
75%25%<1%
3.91
4
Briana Starr
70W–12L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.90
4.5
Cindy Broussard
7W–2L career · no lines in 2022
89%11%<1%
3.84
4
Rochelle Torgusen
48W–24L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Lauren Eittreim
57W–11L career · 9 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.66
4
Denise Duquette
37W–25L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.49
3.5
Edyta Grant
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Carol Maier
5W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Ashley Periera
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Cheyanne Antongiovanni
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Linette Holliday
118W–107L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Diane Bashirtash
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
4
Andrea Ames
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
99%1%<1%
3.18
3.5
Crystal Neptune
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.12
Misty Haverstock
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.