Teams

BCC-Hayden

2022 OH OV SUMMER Tri Level · 2022 SUMMER Trilevel MEN Dayton

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-10-28vs KTC-WoltersLost 02
L#1 DoublesJames Bosse / Donald Nguyen vs Michael Hall / Alexander Boardman1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Rodgers / Christopher Bennington vs Jason Merkle / Chris Schlater6-7, 6-7
2022-07-15vs KTC-WoltersLost 02
L#2 DoublesStephen Hayden / John Peyton vs Michael Budde / Aaron Wolters3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesChristopher Bennington / Jeffrey Rodgers vs Rodolfo Aguilera / Adam Beiersdorfer1-6, 3-6
2022-06-24vs KTC-WoltersLost 12
W#1 DoublesJames Bosse / Charles Simms vs Luke Hoban / Richard Heilman6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStephen Hayden / Donald Nguyen vs Greg Toman / Enrico Ferri3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGary Engelhard / Jeffrey Rodgers vs Adam Beiersdorfer / Shaun Johannes6-7, 3-6
2022-06-10vs KTC-WoltersLost 02
L#1 DoublesJames Bosse / Kurt Goebel vs Richard Heilman / Luke Hoban2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesStephen Hayden / Donald Nguyen vs Enrico Ferri / Greg Toman2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2022 SUMMER Trilevel MEN Dayton
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KTC-Wolters50123690
2BCC-Hayden0511429182

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

James Bosse
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.89
Stephen Hayden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Donald Nguyen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.60
Kurt Goebel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Jeffrey Rodgers
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Gary Engelhard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Christopher Bennington
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
John Peyton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffrey Rodgers + Christopher Bennington1443% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
James Bosse
30W–26L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephen Hayden
10W–18L career · 3 lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
3.89
4
Donald Nguyen
32W–49L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kurt Goebel
18W–13L career · 1 line in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
Jeffrey Rodgers
50W–35L career · 3 lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.59
3.5
Gary Engelhard
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Christopher Bennington
51W–30L career · 2 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.11
John Peyton
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.