Teams

Harr/Nashville

2026 Combo 18 & Over - Nashville · 6.5 Men - Saturday

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-15vs Ladd/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndrew Gura / Akajiugo Amucheazi vs Scott Patterson / Ryan Moss6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKyle Oleksak / Jalil Bowler vs Ronnie Miller / Kunal Marwah1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMatthew Donaldson / Jeff Cochran vs Patrick Zajda / Michael Ladd4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-08-08vs Ladd/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesKyle Oleksak / Jeff Cochran vs Alex Paz / Ryan Moss2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGabriel Harr / Steve Miller vs Connor Horn / Ronnie Miller0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Garde / Akajiugo Amucheazi vs Patrick Zajda / Michael Ladd6-2, 6-3
2026-08-07vs Ladd/NashvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesAkajiugo Amucheazi / Andrew Gura vs Kunal Marwah / Ronnie Miller2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMatthew Donaldson / Michael Garde vs Connor Horn / Ryan Moss6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnuragh Mudakatte / Jose Antequera vs Michael Ladd / Patrick Zajda6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 6.5 Men - Saturday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Harr/Nashville2154982

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Anuragh Mudakatte
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.10
Andrew Gura
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.89
Michael Garde
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.70
Akajiugo Amucheazi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.47
Jalil Bowler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.35
Gabriel Harr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jeff Cochran
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jose Antequera
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kyle Oleksak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Matthew Donaldson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anuragh Mudakatte
13W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Andrew Gura
2W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.10
Michael Garde
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Akajiugo Amucheazi
10W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
Jalil Bowler
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.47
Gabriel Harr
0W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.35
Jeff Cochran
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jose Antequera
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Kyle Oleksak
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Matthew Donaldson
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.