Teams

BC-WestEnd/CarlosCruz-Aedo

2026 ADULT 18 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Men - 5.0

17 players · average NTRP 4.79 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-27vs BC-LLW-ElSegundo/BarryDylewskiLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristopher Dalton / KEISUKE ABIKO vs Barry Dylewski / Ashton Politanoff2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesCarlos Cruz-Aedo vs Jens Sweaney0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTatsuya Ishizuka / Attila Lassu vs Andrew Cahn / Seth Spector2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-06-20vs WC BC-ElSegundo/JarrodQuanWon 30
W#1 DoublesKEISUKE ABIKO / Jacob Lapkin vs Francesco Nguyen / Kyle Vo5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMoosa Choudhary vs Hunter Kettering6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCarlos Cruz-Aedo / Attila Lassu vs Shaurya Dhankar / Michael Cheatham5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2026-06-06vs BC-LLW-ElSegundo/BarryDylewskiLost 12
W#1 DoublesTatsuya Ishizuka / Attila Lassu vs Sascha Kiehne / Charlie Franks4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesChristopher Dalton vs Ruben Alberts1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMoosa Choudhary / KEISUKE ABIKO vs Ashton Politanoff / Casey Grindon2-6, 3-6
2026-05-09vs WC BC-ElSegundo/JarrodQuanLost 12
L#1 DoublesKEISUKE ABIKO / Tatsuya Ishizuka vs Kyle Vo / Lawrence Yiang2-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesAttila Lassu vs Daniel Keolasy6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristopher Dalton / Jeremy Shaw vs Javeed Kassam / Shaurya Dhankar6-7, 1-6
2026-05-02vs BC-LLW-ElSegundo/BarryDylewskiLost 03
L#1 DoublesAttila Lassu / Jacob Lapkin vs Andy Stark / Casey Grindon3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMoosa Choudhary vs Tyler Tulenko1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJJ Hyman / Tracy Hyman vs Erich Taach / Anthony Lee2-6, 1-6
2026-04-18vs WC BC-ElSegundo/JarrodQuanLost 12
L#1 DoublesTatsuya Ishizuka / Moosa Choudhary vs Daniel Keolasy / Lawrence Yiang5-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesKEISUKE ABIKO vs Hunter Kettering6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJacob Lapkin / Bledar Gashi vs Kyle Vo / Javeed Kassam3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · BC Men - 5.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BC-LLW-ElSegundo/BarryDylewski601627107
2WC BC-ElSegundo/JarrodQuan2451326188
3BC-WestEnd/CarlosCruz-Aedo1561228197

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.40 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.79
Attila Lassu
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 5
Bledar Gashi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
Brandon Poon
published 5
4.68
KEISUKE ABIKO
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.51
Tatsuya Ishizuka
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.46
Christopher Dalton
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.44
Jacob Lapkin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.36
Steven Yau
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.34
Manas Madhira
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.34
Moosa Choudhary
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #2 Singles 22% · published
4.30
Justin DeMattos
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.24
Carlos Cruz-Aedo
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.18
Tracy Hyman
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.17
JJ Hyman
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Hannes Schenk
published
Jeremy Shaw
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Pablo Barajas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carlos Cruz-Aedo + Tracy Hyman12956% gamesnot enough data
Justin DeMattos + Tracy Hyman11361% gamesnot enough data
Justin DeMattos + Carlos Cruz-Aedo2340% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Attila Lassu
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.79
5
Bledar Gashi
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
5
Brandon Poon
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
KEISUKE ABIKO
4W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.68
Tatsuya Ishizuka
5W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.51
5
Christopher Dalton
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.46
Jacob Lapkin
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.44
Steven Yau
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
4.36
Manas Madhira
7W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
4.34
Moosa Choudhary
4W–5L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
4.34
4.5
Justin DeMattos
93W–48L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Carlos Cruz-Aedo
78W–49L career · 7 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
4.24
4.5
Tracy Hyman
122W–76L career · 7 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
4.18
JJ Hyman
3W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
4.17
Hannes Schenk
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jeremy Shaw
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Pablo Barajas
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.