Teams

PD40/Braddock/HCC

2025 USTA Mixed Doubles 40 & Over - PD · 3.5 Mixed

13 players · average NTRP 3.20 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-08-06vs PD40/Pitiranggon/EBEWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarian Bunnell / Darrin St Ours vs Mark Desser / Ronelle van Heerden6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLann Waldrop / Terrie Reames vs Angela Lorenz / Leroy Scott Washington0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Brown / Spann Reames vs Thommy Caballero / Marlene Ward2-2
2025-06-03vs PD40/Pitiranggon/EBESplit 11
W#1 DoublesBryan Braddock / Susan Brown vs Ken Williams / Ophillia Dominique7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMike Schock / Terrie Reames vs Mark Desser / Ronelle van Heerden0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Bryan Braddock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.24
Marian Bunnell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Spann Reames
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Lynda Owens
published
2.96
Darrin St Ours
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Jacob Coward
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Allyne Askins
published 3
2.69
Terrie Reames
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Dusty Braddock
published 3
Kevin Light
published
Lann Waldrop
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mike Schock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stephanie Light
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terrie Reames + Darrin St Ours303 matchesnot enough data
Marian Bunnell + Darrin St Ours303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bryan Braddock
4W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.46
Marian Bunnell
17W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%2%
3.24
Spann Reames
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.04
Lynda Owens
21W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Darrin St Ours
19W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Jacob Coward
20W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Allyne Askins
16W–13L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Terrie Reames
13W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Dusty Braddock
5W–12L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
2.63
Kevin Light
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lann Waldrop
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mike Schock
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Light
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.