Teams

Austin 8.5 40 day

2026 NO Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Day · 8.5 NO (40&O) Women Day

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-25vs MCC 40+ 8.5 dayLost 12
L#1 DoublesRonel Treuting / Stacey Messina vs Jennifer Poulin / Amy Neves7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesClaire Lewis / Helene Barnett vs Darbi Philibert / Robyn Schwarz4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesRobin Austin / Michele Bravo vs Kimberly Calamari / Heather Burglass3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 8.5 NO (40&O) Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Browne/Drennan000000
2Cordes000000
3Austin 8.5 40 day000000
4MCC 40+ 8.5 day000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Michele Bravo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.98
Ronel Treuting
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.98
Robin Austin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.97
Lauren Tafaro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Helene Barnett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
3.70
Amanda Silvey
published 4
3.66
Beth Blosser
published 4
3.63
Michelle Brinz
published
3.63
Jennifer Perilloux
published
3.54
Stacey Messina
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Cathy Slumber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Blosser + Helene Barnett4354% games+11.8% vs expected
Robin Austin + Michele Bravo7259% games+2.0% vs expected
Robin Austin + Stacey Messina123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michele Bravo
20W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
31%69%<1%
4.07
Ronel Treuting
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
54%46%<1%
3.98
Robin Austin
31W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.98
Lauren Tafaro
83W–42L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.97
Helene Barnett
30W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Trezmarie Zotkiewicz
11W–17L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Amanda Silvey
20W–11L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Beth Blosser
41W–34L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
Michelle Brinz
15W–19L career · no lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.63
Jennifer Perilloux
37W–34L career · no lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.63
Stacey Messina
14W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54
4
Cathy Slumber
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.