Teams

Harrell - MTC

2025 Shenandoah Adult 40 & Over Weekday Women · Shenandoah Adult 40 & Over Weekday 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-15vs Furgal - Summer CRUSHLost 01
L#3 DoublesSheila Harrell / Joan Eliot vs Niki Friedman / Cammie Furgal3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-07-01vs Place - Sweet ShotsWon 10
W#1 DoublesSheila Harrell / Anne Walker vs Margaret Amy Flaherty / Rebecca Norman6-3, 6-7
2025-06-19vs Providakes - Mood SwingsLost 01
L#2 DoublesSheila Harrell / Daphne Himelfarb vs Allison Meringoff / Pamela Nix4-6, 5-7
2025-06-17vs Furgal - Summer CRUSHWon 10
W#3 DoublesSheila Harrell / Paula Dowdy vs Erin Burnett / Cammie Furgal7-6, 7-5
2025-06-10vs Gibbons - Fired upLost 01
L#1 DoublesSheila Harrell / France Bognon vs Alissa Seiple / Ellen Gibbons4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah Adult 40 & Over Weekday 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Sheila Harrell
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.25
Daphne Himelfarb
published 3.5
3.14
Jane Covington
published
3.14
Tamara Clarke
published
3.12
Maria Costea
published
3.07
Beth Ann Mascatello
published 3.5
3.05
Paula Dowdy
published
2.96
Tricia Earley
published
2.67
Wendy Heuer
published
Emily Hannum
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Heuer + Tricia Earley314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sheila Harrell
132W–87L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Daphne Himelfarb
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Jane Covington
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
Tamara Clarke
56W–80L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
Maria Costea
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Beth Ann Mascatello
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Paula Dowdy
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
Tricia Earley
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%38%
2.96
Wendy Heuer
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Emily Hannum
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.