Teams

MCTA40/Byers/RHTC

Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult Women - 3.5 (PM)

11 players · average NTRP 3.42 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-19vs MCTA40/Ruggiero/RHTCSplit 22
W#1 DoublesStephanie Stanton / Melissa Covington vs Nataliya Rubanenko / Jennifer Ruggiero6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesSarah Nitsche vs Amy Johnson4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJoanne James / Mayela Magur vs Karen Morgan / Nicole Morgan3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLiesl Graf / Iris Hubbard vs Ramonette Belen / Pauline Styers6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2026-04-15vs MCTA 3.5W 40 & Over (Moll)Lost 13
W#1 DoublesStephanie Stanton / Joanne James vs Nancy Moll / Brennan Roberts6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAbitha Begum Mohammed Sherfudeen vs Chivonne Hunter2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJuliette Peoples / Mayela Magur vs Tisa Mullis / Barbara Rawdon1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLakesha Johnson / Charmaine Gittens vs Lori Huechtker / Rae Lynn Pope6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-03-20vs MCTA 3.5W 40 & Over (Moll)Lost 04
L#1 DoublesStephanie Stanton / Abitha Begum Mohammed Sherfudeen vs Jennifer Gluff / Cynthia Hoover0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Nitsche vs Angela Struve0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesIris Hubbard / Lakesha Johnson vs Brennan Roberts / Cecile Yager2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMelissa Covington / Mayela Magur vs Barbara Rawdon / Tisa Mullis3-6, 3-6
2026-03-04vs MCTA40/Ruggiero/RHTCSplit 22
W#1 DoublesScarlett Cochran / Olya Banchik vs Dawn Houpt / Ramonette Belen6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesSarah Nitsche vs Amy Johnson2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJuliette Peoples / Abitha Begum Mohammed Sherfudeen vs Jennifer Ruggiero / Christina Pardi5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMayela Magur / Melissa Covington vs Karen Morgan / Karen Davies7-6, 7-6
2026-02-25vs MCTA 3.5W 40 & Over (Moll)Lost 04
L#1 DoublesOlya Banchik / Stephanie Stanton vs Kristen Unterberg / Jennifer Gluff2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAbitha Begum Mohammed Sherfudeen vs Chivonne Hunter2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJuliette Peoples / Mayela Magur vs Nancy Moll / Tisa Mullis2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLiesl Graf / Lakesha Johnson vs Lori Huechtker / Brennan Roberts1-6, 3-6
2026-02-11vs MCTA40/Ruggiero/RHTCWon 31
W#1 DoublesCharmaine Gittens / Stephanie Stanton vs Stacey Reinhardt / Dawn Greenaway6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAbitha Begum Mohammed Sherfudeen vs Christina Pardi6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesOlya Banchik / Joanne James vs Jennifer Ruggiero / Nataliya Rubanenko3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMelissa Covington / Iris Hubbard vs Pauline Styers / Brooke Kline7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult Women - 3.5 (PM) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Abitha Begum Mohammed Sherfudeen
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.29
Olya Banchik
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Charmaine Gittens
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Scarlett Cochran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Stephanie Stanton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Mayela Magur
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.06
Lakesha Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.98
Iris Hubbard
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.93
Liesl Graf
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.77
Sarah Nitsche
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Melissa Covington
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Iris Hubbard + Liesl Graf2540% games−0.6% vs expected
Scarlett Cochran + Stephanie Stanton2546% games−0.9% vs expected
Charmaine Gittens + Stephanie Stanton4448% games−4.8% vs expected
Mayela Magur + Stephanie Stanton5067% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Nitsche + Stephanie Stanton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Abitha Begum Mohammed Sherfudeen
18W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Olya Banchik
106W–57L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Charmaine Gittens
20W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Scarlett Cochran
74W–61L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
Stephanie Stanton
54W–60L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Mayela Magur
133W–89L career · 5 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
Lakesha Johnson
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
Iris Hubbard
23W–49L career · 3 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.98
3
Liesl Graf
91W–119L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Sarah Nitsche
32W–47L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Melissa Covington
28W–19L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.