Teams

PRC GREEN

2025 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-02vs LTFC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesMark Oshman / Eric Olsen-Dufour vs Yurii Land / Phillip Cruz3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJeff Skolnick / Alan Aguilar vs Scott Ungar / Alec Wynne2-6, 2-6
2025-08-19vs RRTC BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesMark Oshman / Eric Olsen-Dufour vs Charles Beckstrom / Dirk Hanket6-3, 6-4
2025-08-18vs LTFC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesLuis Hidalgo / Max Dickman vs Dane Elliott / Phillip Cruz0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMark Oshman vs Brandon Smith6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAlan Aguilar / Jeff Skolnick vs Brandon Stovall / Jonathan Moore6-7, 5-7
2025-08-12vs CCV ORANGELost 12
L#1 DoublesMax Dickman / Eric Olsen-Dufour vs Tom Wilson / Scott Klein4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLuis Hidalgo vs Matt Spalding4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJeff Skolnick / Mark Oshman vs Jason Abrams / Chad Mezvinsky3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-05vs VCC BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesEric Olsen-Dufour / Jeff Skolnick vs Curtis Georg / Alec Steketee6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMax Dickman vs Sam Himel6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAlan Aguilar / Luis Hidalgo vs Austin Davis / Kaelan Davis6-1, 6-1
2025-08-05Won 10
W#2 DoublesEric Olsen-Dufour / Mark Oshman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-22vs CR-CV REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeff Skolnick / Mark Oshman vs Joshua Daddis / Shawn Shenton6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLuis Hidalgo vs Bryan LaRussa4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Luis Hidalgo
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.39
Mark Oshman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.36
Eric Olsen-Dufour
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.31
Alan Aguilar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Max Dickman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Jeff Skolnick
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alan Aguilar + Jeff Skolnick2446% games−2.3% vs expected
Alan Aguilar + Max Dickman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Luis Hidalgo
19W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Mark Oshman
16W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Eric Olsen-Dufour
151W–59L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Alan Aguilar
16W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Max Dickman
8W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Jeff Skolnick
7W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.