Teams

Moore/Memphis

2026 Combo 18 & Over - Memphis · 8.5 18 & Over Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.10 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 10 9:00 AM
at Brand/Memphis
Memphis Univ. School
Sep 13 2:00 PM
Memphis Univ. School
Sep 17 9:00 AM
at Posey/Memphis
H.W. Cox Tennis Complex
Sep 20 2:00 PM
University Club Of Memphis
2026-08-30vs Lang/ MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarmen Lewis / MeriTaylor Kurdelmeyer vs Dana Bray / Mary Plosser2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBetsy Ferguson / Sarah Hervey vs Jessie Nabors / Cameron Seay3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChristen Lundgren / Leslie Barron vs Lauren Feury / Rachel Baker1-6, 4-6
2026-08-23vs Deupree/MemphisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAimee Gregg / Christen Lundgren vs Lina Yi / Joanna Fuhrman4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Hervey / Betsy Ferguson vs Carley Myrick / Kristen Watson1-6, 4-6
2026-08-09vs Dertien/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarmen Lewis / Meredith Haselwood vs Heather Patterson / Abby G Patterson3-6, 4-1
L#2 DoublesSarah Farris / Meredith Flynn vs Jenny Mortimer / Vivian Gresham6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSarah Hervey / Katie Moore vs Marla Goodwin / Debbie Walker-Hulette6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Aimee Gregg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
Meredith Haselwood
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.94
Dee Pitawanakwat
published 4
3.78
Sarah Farris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Sarah Hervey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.68
Betsy Ferguson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Christen Lundgren
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.37
Leslie Barron
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Carmen Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carmen Lewis + Dee Pitawanakwat4262% games+7.7% vs expected
Dee Pitawanakwat + Sarah Hervey4155% gamesnot enough data
Betsy Ferguson + Sarah Hervey044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Aimee Gregg
9W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Meredith Haselwood
8W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
4.25
4
Dee Pitawanakwat
42W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.94
Sarah Farris
10W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Sarah Hervey
14W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Betsy Ferguson
15W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Christen Lundgren
13W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Leslie Barron
14W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
82%18%<1%
3.37
4
Carmen Lewis
14W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
3.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.