Teams

Grignon 5.5

2021 Anne Arundel Combo · Combo Women 5.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.29 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-10-13vs WoffordWon 10
W#3 DoublesDale Clark / Jill Huntington vs Teresa Taylor / Kim Herman6-1, 6-4
2021-10-10Won 10
W#2 DoublesDale Clark / Jill Huntington vs Camille Dell / Sherri Raimondo6-1, 6-3
2021-10-08vs WoffordSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCarly Dent / Heather Nesti vs Cornelia Wikar / Lisa Mulholland0-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJulie Grignon / Jill Huntington vs Kathy Coyle / Camille Dell6-0, 6-1
2021-10-04vs WoffordWon 10
W#3 DoublesJulie Grignon / Trudy McFall vs Shannon Afarin / Heidi Barron6-4, 6-4
2021-09-30vs WoffordWon 10
W#2 DoublesJulie Grignon / Heather Nesti vs Shannon Afarin / Camille Dell6-3, 6-2
2021-09-25Won 10
W#3 DoublesJill Huntington / Julie Grignon vs Jennifer Sapp / Cornelia Wikar6-4, 6-1
2021-09-20vs WoffordWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulie Grignon / Kelsey Forbes vs Jennifer Sapp / Cornelia Wikar2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHeather Nesti / Christine Robertson vs Heidi Barron / Kathy Coyle6-2, 7-6
2021-09-11vs WoffordSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJill Huntington / JUNE STEINWEG vs Ruth Popp / Cynthia Wofford6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJulie Grignon / Dale Clark vs Lisa Mulholland / Teresa Taylor7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2021-08-30vs WoffordWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Grignon / Heather Nesti vs Shannon Afarin / Camille Dell6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Xenia Baranova
published 4
3.69
Kelsey Forbes
published 4
3.46
Dale Clark
published 3.5
3.14
Jill Huntington
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 3
3.14
Heather Nesti
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.88
Julie Grignon
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.12
JUNE STEINWEG
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Grignon + Heather Nesti5063% gamesnot enough data
Julie Grignon + Jill Huntington404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Xenia Baranova
204W–68L career · no lines in 2021
<1%75%24%
3.91
4
Kelsey Forbes
141W–114L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Dale Clark
19W–30L career · no lines in 2021
<1%62%38%
3.46
3
Jill Huntington
206W–137L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%14%86%
3.14
3
Heather Nesti
180W–165L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%14%86%
3.14
3
Julie Grignon
86W–70L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
2.88
2.5
JUNE STEINWEG
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
2.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.