Teams

Bako - Team Rhodes

2023 Adult 55 & Over - Bakersfield · Women's 8.0 - Bake

11 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-02-19vs LLW - Bako - Team WetterholmWon 10
W#2 DoublesRhonda Slegers / Laura Amason vs Carol Maier / Amy Meger6-2, 6-3
2023-01-29vs LLW - Bako - Team WetterholmSplit 11
L#2 DoublesHedy Bloom / Linette Holliday vs Sarah Crowley / Jeannie Munn1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRebecca Badgett / Rhonda Slegers vs Janet Strandberg / Mary King4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-01-15vs LLW - Bako - Team WetterholmLost 02
L#1 DoublesHedy Bloom / Linette Holliday vs Sally Goossen / Beverly Wetterholm0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLaura Amason / Rhonda Slegers vs Amy Meger / Carol Maier2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-01-08vs LLW - Bako - Team WetterholmLost 01
L#1 DoublesLinette Holliday / Rhonda Slegers vs Sally Goossen / Beth van Voorhis2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 8.0 - Bake have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Denise Duquette
published 4
3.39
Susan Frakes
published
3.34
Rhonda Slegers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Laura Amason
published
Dawn Rhodes
published 3.5
3.23
Linette Holliday
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Rebecca Badgett
published
Donna Tracy
published
Gioconda Erquiaga
published
Ronel Rabe
published
Sheri Wallace
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rhonda Slegers + Linette Holliday5350% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Denise Duquette
37W–25L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.48
Susan Frakes
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Rhonda Slegers
54W–40L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
Laura Amason
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%3%97%
3.27
3.5
Dawn Rhodes
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Linette Holliday
118W–107L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Rebecca Badgett
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.06
Donna Tracy
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Gioconda Erquiaga
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ronel Rabe
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sheri Wallace
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.