← Teams

N OR-VTC-Schweitz

2023 Mixed 40 & Over · 9.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 4.27 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Sanja Lemes
published 5
—
Stephanie Paulson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.24
Josh Schweitz
published 4.5
4.05
Amy Bucher
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.84
Francisco Rivera-Giusti
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
—
Kira Dennison Capen
published 4
—
Wanda Nijholt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Mary Klinger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Jerilyn Hanson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.54
Leah Buxman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Jennifer Simmons
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Results8 ties
2023-03-12Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesMary Klinger / Craig Pearce vs Jesus Javier Ruiz Rojas / Takumi Koyama6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesStephanie Paulson / Josh Schweitz vs Jim Rankin / Xia Wu6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJerilyn Hanson / Carl Swanson vs Michael Sather / Sue Gregoire6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2023-03-11Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesJerilyn Hanson / Carl Swanson vs Janelle Laurila / Jeb Hubbs7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLeah Buxman / Brian Board vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-02-11Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesAmy Bucher / Craig Pearce vs Cindy Rushall / Matthew Condit6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJennifer Simmons / Brian Board vs Lisa Provost / William Haynes6-1, 7-6
2023-02-04Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesMary Klinger / Josh Schweitz vs Shannon Bilstrom / Bo Johnson7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Bucher / Craig Pearce vs Annie Duong / Benjamin Yang7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesWanda Nijholt / Dyllan Fitzgerald vs Michelle Aman / David Mittelstadt6-2, 6-3
2023-01-29Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesMary Klinger / Dyllan Fitzgerald vs Kirsten Ruchaber / Jorge Fuenmayor6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSanja Lemes / Francisco Rivera-Giusti vs Cathrine Olander / Joerg Droste7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesWanda Nijholt / Brian Board vs Kerstin Anderson / Yascha Noonberg6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-01-22Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesFrancisco Rivera-Giusti / Sanja Lemes vs Krista Mikalatos / Brent Waddle6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLeah Buxman / Craig Pearce vs Minou Chau / Thomas McGirk6-4, 6-3
2023-01-20Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesCraig Pearce / Amy Bucher vs Bart Borosky / Monika Dolega-kowalewski6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSanja Lemes / Francisco Rivera-Giusti vs Jennifer Larsen / Wahyu Setyawan6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2023-01-08Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJosh Schweitz / Stephanie Paulson vs Jon Monson / Raini Spitze7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCraig Pearce / Jennifer Simmons vs Alix Edwards / Jeffrey Hunt6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesFrancisco Rivera-Giusti / Sanja Lemes vs Steve Bidwell / Lisa Gray6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

5
Sanja Lemes
25W–13L career
not enough data
—
5
Stephanie Paulson
119W–43L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Josh Schweitz
58W–30L career
0%98%2%
4.24
4.5
Amy Bucher
179W–78L career
10%90%0%
4.05
4
Francisco Rivera-Giusti
126W–98L career
0%99%1%
3.84
4
Kira Dennison Capen
28W–40L career · type A
not enough data
—
4
Wanda Nijholt
31W–21L career
not enough data
—
4
Mary Klinger
221W–142L career
2%98%0%
3.70
4
Jerilyn Hanson
12W–27L career · type A
14%85%1%
3.66
4
Leah Buxman
113W–106L career
23%77%0%
3.54
4
Jennifer Simmons
63W–75L career
28%72%0%
3.53

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.