Teams

GTC SILVER

2021 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 8.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-07-03vs GTC REDWon 10
W#3 DoublesLani Reichardt / Christopher Seerveld vs Bryan Humphrys / Jennifer Thomas6-4, 6-1
2021-06-27vs GTC NAVYLost 01
L#3 DoublesLani Reichardt / Christopher Seerveld vs Angie Shappell / Bruce Silver6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2021-06-25vs CACM REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSuresh Gevaran / Lani Reichardt vs Randal Ankeney / Megan Ryall7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAntonio Vigil / Somsi Stringer vs Adam Ferry / Kara Boulanger4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-06-06vs GAC GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesAngela Hedgepeth / Antonio Vigil vs Chelsea Ye / Bo Lee6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesChristopher Seerveld / Somsi Stringer vs Michael Runda / Maria Angela Lutterbach7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSuresh Gevaran / Lani Reichardt vs William Dampier / Marli Davis6-0, 6-2
2021-05-28vs GTC NAVYLost 01
L#3 DoublesChristopher Seerveld / Somsi Stringer vs Tracy Brunschwig / John Feldman4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Suresh Gevaran
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.89
Christine Hong
published 4.5
3.74
Maria Matney
published 4
3.67
Somsi Stringer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Antonio Vigil
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Jennifer Gilliland
published
3.27
Lani Reichardt
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Angela Hedgepeth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Christopher Seerveld
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Thane Benedict
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lani Reichardt + Suresh Gevaran2348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Suresh Gevaran
124W–57L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%17%83%
4.12
4.5
Christine Hong
37W–53L career · no lines in 2021
81%19%<1%
3.89
4
Maria Matney
54W–31L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Somsi Stringer
112W–95L career · 3 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Antonio Vigil
39W–70L career · 1 line in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.63
Jennifer Gilliland
50W–90L career · no lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Lani Reichardt
98W–122L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
Angela Hedgepeth
10W–12L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Christopher Seerveld
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Thane Benedict
20W–22L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.