Teams

McMullen Framers 55 8.0

2025 Pinellas Mixed 55 & Over Fall · 8.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 4.08 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-16vs McMullen PasinskiWon 10
W#3 DoublesRobert Ironsmith / Michele Ironsmith vs Christopher Hollingsworth / Monica Sanchez4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-11-11vs Seminole Lake Dsa 55 8.0 XLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichele Ironsmith / Robert Ironsmith vs Dane Houston / Jennifer Strawser6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2025-11-09vs Seminole Lake Dsa 55 8.0 XSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLisa Oonk / James Plunkett vs Teresa Orr / Greg Hilbert4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMichele Ironsmith / Robert Ironsmith vs Britt Decker / Debra Decker6-1, 6-1
2025-11-02vs Florida/Abrams/55&Over8.0XWon 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Oonk / James Plunkett vs Karen Abrams / Daren McGovern1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-10-26vs McMullen PasinskiLost 02
L#2 DoublesRobert Ironsmith / Michele Ironsmith vs Brian Hodapp / Rhonda Mendoza2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesFelix Herrera / Debra Hinners vs Christopher Hollingsworth / Amy Brooks1-6, 3-6
2025-10-19vs Seminole Lake Dsa 55 8.0 XWon 10
W#2 DoublesFelix Herrera / Lisa Oonk vs Teresa Orr / Greg Hilbert7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2025-10-12vs Florida/Abrams/55&Over8.0XLost 02
L#1 DoublesFelix Herrera / Lisa Oonk vs Chris Canfield / Zobeida Canfield3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDebra Hinners / James Plunkett vs Karen Abrams / Doug Clery3-6, 1-6
2025-10-05vs McMullen PasinskiWon 10
W#2 DoublesKoray Yilmaz / Cambria Whalen vs John Hockin / Janet Karpan6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Michele Ironsmith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.96
Beatriz Dones
published 4
3.78
Lisa Oonk
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.75
Cambria Whalen
published 4
3.74
Koray Yilmaz
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.59
Mary Jacobs
published
3.52
Debra Hinners
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Paul Jacobs
published
Robert Ironsmith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Ironsmith + Michele Ironsmith2349% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Oonk + Koray Yilmaz033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Michele Ironsmith
158W–102L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
4.50
4
Beatriz Dones
19W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.96
4
Lisa Oonk
217W–231L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Cambria Whalen
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Koray Yilmaz
148W–84L career · 8 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.74
Mary Jacobs
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.59
4
Debra Hinners
37W–87L career · 2 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
Paul Jacobs
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Ironsmith
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.