Teams

W18-3.5-Torrimar-Lizjacnira Martinez

Adult 18 & Over 2021 · 2021 18 & Over Women 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.69 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-09-03vs W18-3.5-Ponce-Ileana NigaglioniLost 01
L#2 DoublesLizjacnira Martinez / Natalia Serra vs Natalie Alamo-Rodriguez / Melanie Garcia1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMyra Velez / Mariela Estrada vs Anel Alejandro / Angie Melissa Perez6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMyra Velez / Arleen Figueroa vs Mariela Antomattei / Jennifer Fuentes1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLizjacnira Martinez / Natalia Serra vs Irene Feliu / Carla Colon4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLizjacnira Martinez / Frances Rodriguez Varela vs PAOLA VAZQUEZ / Kimberly Santos0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesArleen Figueroa / Myra Velez vs ANA CAMPOO / Jaidys Rossy6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2021 18 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Natalia Serra
published
3.88
Marina Cardona
published
3.79
Elica MacHin
published 4
3.63
Maria Cardona
published
3.56
Anelisa Merced
published 4
3.46
Lizjacnira Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
IMARI MARTINEZ
published 3.5
3.26
Myra Velez
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Arleen Figueroa
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Mariela Estrada
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalia Serra + Anelisa Merced8063% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalia Serra
70W–34L career · no lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
4.15
Marina Cardona
46W–25L career · no lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Elica MacHin
28W–13L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Frances Reyes Penalverty
49W–40L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
Maria Cardona
25W–12L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.63
4
Anelisa Merced
89W–52L career · no lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Lizjacnira Martinez
74W–68L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%64%36%
3.46
3.5
IMARI MARTINEZ
57W–27L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Myra Velez
47W–67L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Arleen Figueroa
39W–85L career · 2 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Frances Rodriguez Varela
9W–12L career · no lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.12
Mariela Estrada
25W–19L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Vanessa Fenn Gonzalez
21W–22L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.