Teams

KTAC-Sugimoto-Ad In

2022 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed Multi-week

12 players · average NTRP 3.55 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-31vs VAC-McKayWon 21
L#1 DoublesDavid Smith / Jackie Osland vs Violet Clerget / Richard Graham3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBill Boyett / Karen Fossum vs Kevin Robinson / Kathi McKay6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChris Blankenship / Tiffany Washington vs Arlene Hartman / Jim Clerget6-4, 6-0
2022-07-23vs JTC-Hewitt-Double ShotsWon 21
L#1 DoublesLeslie Engelhard / Chris Blankenship vs Lana Lane / Eric Beard3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDavid Smith / Uyen Lee vs Bryce Clarke / Debbie Dymarkowski6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKristi Gonzalez / Ken Ahlstrom vs Wendy Clarke / Jeffrey McBroom6-4, 7-6
2022-07-17vs LRC-Monson/BensonLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Smith / Uyen Lee vs Aris Rosario / Jolene Rhodes4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesBill Boyett / Karen Fossum vs Rhonda Wilson / Lupe Gonzales6-6
L#3 DoublesGeorge Garest / Leslie Engelhard vs Julie Monson / Byeong Choi2-6, 6-7
2022-07-16vs SPR-CM-Parker/BerryWon 30
W#1 DoublesKen Ahlstrom / Kristi Gonzalez vs Theresa Smith / Robert Mattson6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDavid Smith / Uyen Lee vs Michelle Cowger / Steve Cowger6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTiffany Washington / Eric Moe vs Karin Mattson / Anthony Williamson7-5, 6-1
2022-07-15vs TLTC-RayWon 30
W#1 DoublesKen Ahlstrom / Uyen Lee vs Devin Reilly / Mary Jane Stackpole7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBill Boyett / Karen Fossum vs Eric Henning / Renee Houston6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesChiyuki Sugimoto / Brian Barrett vs Joe Brady / Merilee Tanbara6-1, 6-3
2022-07-02vs TLTC-Duggan-Ace of ClubsWon 21
W#1 DoublesEric Moe / Kristi Gonzalez vs Dana Manke / Eric Manke6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesChris Blankenship / Tiffany Washington vs Sara Simonson / Will Simonson7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChiyuki Sugimoto / Brian Barrett vs Tim Duggan / Chino Mclaughlin6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2022-06-18vs LRC-Hanson/WyattWon 30
W#1 DoublesUyen Lee / David Smith vs Denise Dickerson / Darran Hanson4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBill Boyett / Kristi Gonzalez vs Barbara Wyatt / Bryson Huie6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesGeorge Garest / Jackie Osland vs Thomas Stumpf / Barbara Hickey6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 7.0 Mixed Multi-week
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TLTC-Duggan-Ace of Clubs6118310149
2KTAC-Sugimoto-Ad In6116512148
3SPR-CM-Parker/Berry34101122177
4LRC-Monson/Benson3481328225
5LRC-Hanson/Wyatt2581328209
6JTC-Hewitt-Double Shots2571431221
7TLTC-Ray1621939243

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Ken Ahlstrom
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.75
Chiyuki Sugimoto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Uyen Lee
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.45
Jackie Osland
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Karen Fossum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Chris Blankenship
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Kristi Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Eric Moe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
Tiffany Washington
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.87
Bill Boyett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Leslie Engelhard
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Brian Barrett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ken Ahlstrom + Kristi Gonzalez5262% games+1.4% vs expected
Karen Fossum + Bill Boyett221851% games+0.3% vs expected
Eric Moe + Kristi Gonzalez261852% games−0.8% vs expected
Karen Fossum + Eric Moe5157% gamesnot enough data
Chiyuki Sugimoto + Chris Blankenship4162% gamesnot enough data
Bill Boyett + Kristi Gonzalez3253% gamesnot enough data
Chiyuki Sugimoto + Brian Barrett224 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Engelhard + Bill Boyett303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ken Ahlstrom
82W–59L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Chiyuki Sugimoto
136W–94L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Uyen Lee
168W–85L career · 5 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Jackie Osland
107W–66L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Karen Fossum
187W–175L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Chris Blankenship
57W–45L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Kristi Gonzalez
146W–111L career · 4 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Eric Moe
91W–100L career · 2 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Tiffany Washington
108W–88L career · 3 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.06
3
Bill Boyett
114W–129L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Leslie Engelhard
49W–80L career · 2 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
2.60
Brian Barrett
13W–14L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.